ACADEMIC, APPELLATE, AND SENATE COMMITTEE
ANNUAL REPORT
2004-2005 Academic Year
DUE: May 5, 2005
(Please
limit the report to two pages.)
Committee:
Faculty Information Technology Review Committee
1. Membership
(include ex-officio members).
·
Regular: Karl Wuensch
(chair), Yong Wang (vice chair), Paul Fletcher, Mohamad
Kashef, Audrey Kilgore, Philip Rothman, Elaine Seeman.
·
Ex-Officio: Jack Brinn, Elmer
Poe, Richard Marks, Maggie O’Neill, Jeff Shinpaugh, Mohammad
Tabrizi
2. Meeting
Dates (include members present*).
* and members who contributed to committee action, but were
not at the meeting.
- 13.
Sept. 2004: Brinn, Kilgore, Marks, O’Neill, Seeman, Shinpaugh, Tabrizi, Wang, Wuensch, and guests Jim Smith, Catherine
Rigsby, and Jim Joyce.
- October 2004 (online): Wuensch, Wang (vice chair), Fletcher, Kashef, Kilgore, Rothman, Seeman
Brinn, Poe, Marks, O’Neill, Shinpaugh,
Tabrizi.
- 13. Dec. 2004: Fletcher, Kashef,
Kilgore, Poe, Rothman, Seeman, Tabrizi, Wang, Wuensch, and Joe Norris (for Brinn).
- 10. Jan. 2005: Brinn,
Fletcher, Kilgore, Marks, Poe, Seeman, Wang,
Wuensch, and guest Catherine Rigsby.
- February 2005 (online): Wuensch, Wang (vice chair), Fletcher, Kashef, Kilgore, Rothman, Seeman
Brinn, Poe, Marks, O’Neill, Shinpaugh,
Tabrizi.
- 11. April 2005: Kilgore, Poe, Seeman,
Shinpaugh, Tabrizi,
Wang, Wuensch.
3. Subcommittees established during the
year (include progress and/or completion of work).
none
4. Accomplishments
during the year, especially as addressed through committee goals. Please include recommendations made to any
University agency other than the Faculty Senate that will be noted under
#5.
·
Revised application materials for SCTF Innovative Project
Proposals.
·
Revised procedures for evaluating SCTF Innovative Project Proposals.
·
Evaluated SCTF Innovative Project Proposals.
5. Reports
to the Faculty Senate (include dates and resolution numbers).
·
Faculty Senate Resolution #04-27:
Revised 2004-05 Application for Student Computer and Technology Fee
Innovative Project Proposal. October
12, 2004.
6. Business
carried over to next year (list in priority order).
·
Review of the feedback from units whose innovative project
proposals were funded in 2004.
·
Review of specifications for faculty workstations to be purchased
in 2005-2006.
7. Evaluation
of the committee (include anything that hindered or assisted the
committee's work during the year).
A. Charge: appropriate
B. Personnel: outstanding
C. Attendance: good
D. Responsibilities: appropriate
E. Activities: sometimes exhausting
8. Suggestion(s)
to the Chair of the Faculty and/or Faculty Senate for improving the
effectiveness of the committee.
none
9. Does
the Committee’s organizational meeting next year need to be earlier than the
date set this year?
no
If
yes, when do you prefer:_____________________________________________
Signed: Chairperson 
Secretary
The completed, typed report,
including both the Chair and Secretary's signatures, is due in the
Faculty Senate office (140 Rawl Annex) by May 5, 2005.