Board of Trustees
Remarks
Janice Tovey, Chair
of the Faculty
November 21, 2008
Today, I want to discuss, from the faculty and faculty senate perspective,
the process for the adoption of the policies regarding enrollment management.
Discussion began on the task force report in committee meeting yesterday and I
want to let you know what I have already done and what will happen over the
next several months.
Before I discuss enrollment management, the Senate has recently acted on
other items of importance. As you know from your discussion and vote in
Executive Committee yesterday afternoon, Appendix B, Policy for Performance Review of Tenured Faculty—or
better known as post tenure review—was passed in October by the Senate. The revisions
strengthen the process of review and provide for the inclusion of an action
plan for faculty who do not meet the minimum criteria.
Among the other items that the Senate has recently approved are the Unit
Academic Program Review Guidelines, which also requires a revision to Appendix
L. That revision goes to the senate in early December. The Senate also approved
guidelines for programs that are being reviewed for low enrollment and low
productivity, as determined by GA. GA’s list is generated by the number of
enrolled students and graduates over a set period of time and does not take
into account the role of the program in the unit or the university, the
societal or university need for the program, or the rationale for those low
numbers. These guidelines, prepared by faculty members on the Educational
Policies and Planning Committee, should help units respond to and argue for
continued support for programs where appropriate. In this economic downturn, it
might be easy to say, “Well if its numbers are low, let’s cut it.” But, that
too easy and eliminating some programs might be detrimental to the overall
mission of the university.
Now: enrollment management. Members of the faculty and staff on both
campuses had open meetings in which to discuss the draft of the task force
report. We heard many good questions and comments and generally the report was
well received. I’m encouraged by the
support that the faculty has given to it—they don’t like all the
recommendations and they will want to discuss many others before we make them
policy, but they understand the need and want to help.
In order to support the admission standards that have already been put
in place for Spring 2009, and Fall 2009, I have charged two faculty senate
committees—Admission and Retention Policies Committee and Academic Standards
Committee—to work together with input from members of the task force to review
and offer recommendations for section 2.8: IMPLEMENT ACADEMIC POLICY
CHANGES. Recommendations 2.8.1 through
2.8.8 include such policies as academic standards in general and specifically
the required earned GPA after a set number of hours, the forgiveness policy,
suspension policy, admission criteria, and off campus course policy and would
seem to be items that can be handled within a relatively short time frame. I have asked these committees to report to
the Senate in March with recommended revisions or a progress report.
My next step will be to meet with my fellow officers to review the
entire draft and determine what other recommendations need to be handled by
senate committees and which committee should review them. Once we have
completed that task, I will meet with members of administration to discuss with
them possible timelines for these actions. At that point, I will begin to
charge various faculty senate committees with the task of reviewing,
researching, and making recommendations for changes to policy.
Just to clarify the process under which we operate: once the committee
revises a policy, they submit a motion for approval to the senate. Following
discussion, the senate will either approve or deny the motion or may send it
back to the committee with suggestions for further revisions. Once the policy
is approved by the senate, I send it to the Chancellor for his approval. From
there, the policy either goes into effect or it comes to you, the Board of
Trustees, and then to GA for final approval.
I will continue to update you each month on the progress we are making.
As a member of the Task Force and as Chair of the Faculty, I am
committed to the goals of this report:
specifically to improve our retention and graduation rates by admitting
students who meet our admission standards and can succeed academically.
Thank you