COMMITTEE: Academic
Standards Committee
MEETING DATE: September
15, 2008
PERSON PRESIDING: Linda
Wolfe
REGULAR MEMBERS PRESENT:
Stacey
Altman, Michael Brown, Nancy Spalding, Mark Sprague, Linda Mitchell
,and Linda Wolfe
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT:
George Bailey, Michelle Elbe, and Linner Griffin
OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Jan Tovey, Chair of the Faculty
CALLED TO ORDER: 2:00
PM
ACTIONS OF MEETING:
Agenda Item: Election of Committee Officers
Action Taken: Linda
Wolfe elected chair
Nancy Spalding elected Vice Chair
Stacey Altman elected Secretary
Agenda Item: Discussion of schedule
of meetings
Discussion: L. Wolfe announced that meetings
will take place on:
-October 20, 2008
-November 17, 2008
-February 16, 2009
-March 16, 2009
-April 20, 2009
Agenda Item: Discussion of the Charge
of the Committee
Discussion: L. Wolfe explained that Committee
Charge was contained in document titled Academic Standards Committee Charge
(Faculty Senate Resolution #01-9, February 27, 2001, editorially revised
#05-16). She specifically mentioned Item # 4C “The Committee makes
recommendations regarding proposed changes, including individual courses, in
the general education requirements. …” and directed the Committee to review the
others.
Action Taken: None
Agenda Item: Discussion of the Guidelines for
Outcome Assessment
Discussion: G. Bailey explained that the
development of procedures and criteria for learning goal and outcome assessment
was in the purview of the Academic Standards Committee. The administrative task
of reviewing the “output” is the responsibility of the Assessment Committee or
other administrative mechanism.
L.
Wolfe formed a subcommittee consisting of G. Bailey, M. Brown, and L. Wolfe.
The subcommittee will provide further guidance/clarification by October 20,
2008. G. Bailey also noted that Deans, Chairs and other administrators should
have the guidelines and proceeding to form faculty committees charged with
developing a learning goal with at least one learning outcome (and method of
assessment for that outcome) for each degree program AND a learning goal and at
least one learning outcome (and method of assessment for that outcome) for
FOUNDATIONS COURSES.
Agenda Item: Upcoming FOUNDATIONS COURSE credit
proposals
Discussion: L.
Wolfe noted that she expected at least four proposals to be presented at the
October meeting.
Agenda Item: The
recording of “Incomplete” when grades are not submitted
Discussion: J.
Tovey reminded the Committee of this issue. G. Bailey provided clarification.
The issue has been that students are “given a grade” (I) when in fact, the
instructor has not “recorded” a grade. N. Spalding, having experienced the
administrative task of correcting such a situation, explained the negative
effects of this process. While, the Committee agreed that faculty members
should be held accountable for timely grade submission, some additional
measures were suggested to deal with the reality of grade submission. One
suggestion was to have an alternative word or phrase entered (e.g. “NG” for no grade submitted). Additionally,
it was suggested by M. Sprague that faculty could be given an opportunity (in
Banner or via another electronic interface) to enter their grades later (or
change the incompletes).
ADJOURNED: 2:40
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Stacey Altman