COMMITTEE:
Academic
Standards Committee
MEETING DATE: September
21, 2009
PERSON PRESIDING: Linda
Wolfe
REGULAR MEMBERS PRESENT:
Michael
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: George Bailey, Linner Griffin, Jan Tovey, Steve Kresch
OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE: Marianna Walker, Lori
Lee
CALLED TO ORDER: 2:00
PM
ACTIONS OF MEETING:
Agenda Item: Discussion of Agenda with Chair of Faculty
Discussion: Review of Faculty Manual section by section;
discussion of committee charge
Agenda Item: Election
of Officers
Chair, Linda
Wolfe; Vice Chair, Mike Brown; Secretary, Nancy Spalding; Jan Tovey appointed
representative to the Athletic Committee
Agenda Item: Mike Brown presented an urgent proposal from (what
committee?) concerning SOIS
Academic
Standards Recommendation re: SOIS
Any change in instrument or revision of the
existing student survey instrument will take time if it is to be done well.
In the interim, the committee proposes that the university continue with
the current SOIS while the process is under review but with the following
recommendations:
1. Administer the current SOIS instrument without item
19.
2. The Provost’s Office should ensure that new unit
administrators receive training prior to the annual evaluation of faculty in
the use of multiple methods of evaluating teaching effectiveness.
3. The Provost’s Office should ensure that current unit
administrators receive training prior to the annual evaluation of faculty in
the use of multiple methods of evaluating teaching effectiveness.
4. IPAR utilize a variety of
methods to enhance the rate of student participation. This could include
simplifying access to the instrument, such as adding a direct link from
Blackboard courseware to the SOIS survey, utilizing campus plasma TVs to
increase awareness of completing the survey, and other appropriate means of
encouraging students’ participation.
Discussion:
In order for the proposal to be
considered by the
Action Voted
to send to the
Amended Proposal passed:
Academic Standards Recommendation re: SOIS
Any change in
instrument or revision of the existing student survey instrument will take time
if it is to be done well. In the
interim, the committee proposes that the university continue with the current
SOIS while the process is under review but with the following recommendations:
1.
Administer the current SOIS instrument without item
19.
2.
The Provost’s Office should ensure that unit
administrators receive training prior to the annual evaluation of faculty in
the use of multiple methods of evaluating teaching effectiveness.
3.
IPAR utilize a variety of methods to enhance the rate
of student participation. This could include simplifying access to the
instrument, such as adding a direct link from Blackboard courseware to the SOIS
survey, utilizing campus plasma TVs to increase awareness of completing the
survey, and other appropriate means of encouraging students’ participation.
ADJOURNED: 4:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, Nancy Spalding