FACULTY SENATE RESOLUTION 05-03
Approved by
the Faculty Senate: January 25, 2005
Approved by
the Chancellor: February 7, 2005
|
Peer Review Instrument to include Review of Distance
Education Courses |
|
Professor____________________ |
|
Class_________________________ |
|
Time_______________________ |
|
# of
Students__________________ |
FOR NON TENURED AND FIXED TERM FACULTY
(Peer Version)
Using the
items below, record your observations.
Your mark(s) on or somewhere between the distinctions “does well” and
“needs improvement” should indicate what overall assessment for the category is
assigned.
|
Category
1: Organization |
Needs Improvement |
Does Well |
NA/UO |
||
|
Begins
the instructional session in a timely fashion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provides
needed information in a timely manner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly
states goals or objectives for the instructional session |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
prior instructional material to prepare the students for the content to be
covered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarizes
and/or distills main points at the close of the instructional session |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presents
topics in logical sequence and flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
2: Content |
Needs Improvement |
Does Well |
NA/UO |
||
|
Selects
examples relevant to student experiences/ course content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presents
up to date developments in the field |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provides
content for an instructional session in an organized fashion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrates
command of subject matter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
3: Presentation |
Needs Improvement |
Does Well |
NA/UO |
||
|
Communicates
clearly using chosen delivery medium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communicates
a sense of enthusiasm toward the content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation
style facilitates student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selects
teaching methods and instructional strategies appropriate for the content,
objectives, and chosen delivery medium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relates
current course content to previous and subsequent content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carefully
explains assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
4: Rapport/Interaction |
Needs Improvement |
Does Well |
NA/UO |
||
|
Establishes
and follows established criteria for class interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treats
all students in a fair and equitable manner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Respects
diverse points of view |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establishes
an environment that encourages students’ participation and questions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responds
constructively to students’ questions, opinions and comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provides
corrective feedback to wrong answers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prompts
students to answer difficult questions and solve complex problems by
providing cues and encouragement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitates
student to student communication and interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is able
to admit error/insufficient knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
5: Active Learning (labs, PE activities, clinics, etc.)
OPTIONAL |
Needs Improvement |
Does Well |
NA/UO |
||
|
Clearly
explains directions or procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitates
access to materials and equipment necessary to complete the activity in a
timely manner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explains
safety procedures when warranted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allows
sufficient time for completion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA/UO - not
applicable/unable to observe
|
Observer________________________ |
Date_______ |
Time
in___ |
Time out__ |
Areas of
Strength:
Areas to
consider for Faculty Development Plan: