COMMITTEE: Academic
Standards Committee
MEETING DATE: October
23, 2006
PERSON PRESIDING: Linda
Wolfe
REGULAR MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Bauer,
McConnell, Smith-Canter, Richardson, Lorenzo, Thomas
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Brown, Bailey,
Sprague
OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Michael Poteat and Chuck Rich from the
Department of Institutional Planning, Research and Effectiveness
CALLED TO ORDER: 2:00 PM
ACTIONS OF MEETING
Agenda
Item: Approval of Minutes of 9/18/06
Action Taken: Approved
________________________________________________
Agenda Item: Consideration of
an web version of the SOIS
Discussion:
Dr. Poteat led a review of the issues involved in moving the Student Opinion of
Instruction Survey from a paper version to the Internet. He provided several materials to help guide
our discussion, including a recent PowerPoint demonstration that had been
prepared to summarize the research concerning the advantages and drawbacks to a
web-based SOIS. Dr. Poteat summarized the
savings in cost, staffing, and time (both class time and survey preparation
time), as well as the potential benefits in response rate. He mentioned how a comparison could be made
with the DE survey that is already web-based.
For the SOIS on the web, a new form will need to be developed and able
to be used on the mainframe. Questions
were raised concerning security (including student privacy) and how results
will be retrieved and stored; Dr. Poteat
answered that all security issues will be addressed and resolved and the survey
results could be sent both electronically and as a paper copy to each
instructor and department chair.
Action
Taken: Bailey made the motion which was
seconded by Bauer that the committee approves the recommended change to an
on-line version of the SOIS and requests that Dr. Poteat present the motion to
the Faculty Senate for their approval.
______________________________________________
Agenda Item: Consideration of the CLA (Collegiate Learning
Assessment) and its potential adoption by East Carolina University
Discussion: Dr. Poteat provided materials to the
committee discussing the CLA, and he briefly reviewed the interest the upper
administration has taken in the assessment (though has declined to pursue at
the current time). He discussed how that
CLA is administered to compare freshmen students with seniors in tests that
evaluate skills in critical analysis.
After the committee raised several questions concerning the objectives
of the assessment, its evaluation, and how the results would be used, the topic
was tabled for future discussion when the administration decides to
reconsidered the issue.
Action
Taken: deferred to a future date
________________________________________________
Agenda Item: Consideration of outcomes
assessment for courses approved for Foundations credit
Discussion:
Dr. Poteat provided materials to the committee related to the SACS’ standard
and evaluation of the general education outcomes. Due to time constraints, it was decided by the
committee chair to table the discussion of outcomes assessment until our next
meeting.
Action
Taken: deferred to the next committee
meeting
________________________________________________
ADJOURNED: 3:30 p.m.
NEXT MEETING: Scheduled
for November 20, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: The
committee will discuss any new courses submitted for Foundations credit; Mike
Poteat will return to report concerning the deliberations of the Faculty Senate
concerning the motion to move the SOIS to the web and to assist the ASC with a
discussion of outcomes assessment for Foundation courses; Mike Brown will
provide a report from the meeting of the Athletic Department committee; Linda
Wolfe will report on the discussions from the Continuing and Career Education
Committee regarding the issue of a Distance Education survey being developed;