East
Carolina University Faculty Manual
APPENDIX
X.
GRIEVANCE
PROCEDURES FOR COMPLAINTS OF SEXUAL OR RACIAL HARASSMENT OR DISCRIMINATION OR
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BROUGHT AGAINST EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FACULTY MEMBERS
OR ADMINISTRATORS HOLDING FACULTY STATUS.*
VII. Level
Two Grievance Procedures
Level
Two grievance procedures are initiated at the request of complainants and
require that complainants submit written complaints to the Grievance
Officer. Written complaints of
harassment, discrimination, or conflicts of interest submitted to the Grievance
Officer by the complainants will contain (at least) the following: (a) the
complainants' description of the alleged events, including times, dates,
places, and witnesses, if possible; (b) the complainants’ description of the
effects, if any, of the alleged events; (c) the names of the individuals
alleged to have subjected the complainants to harassment or discrimination, or
alleged to be in violation of the University's conflict of interest policy .
(d) the names of the complainants; (e) the signatures of the complainants; and
(f) the signature of the Grievance Officer, with the date of receipt of the
complaint.
Within
ten working days of receiving written and signed grievances, the Grievance
Officer will supply the respondents with copies of the complaints brought
against them. When the identity of the
complainants has been made known to the respondents, every effort will be made
to protect all parties and witnesses from retaliatory action by the respondents.
1. If no
previous attempt at a Level One resolution of the grievance has been made,
within ten working days of providing the respondents with a copy of the
complaints against them, the Grievance Officer will request the complainants to
initiate a Level One resolution of the grievance. If the complaints do not agree then the Grievance Officer will
proceed with the Level Two grievance procedure. If a Level One resolution of the grievance is attempted and
complainants remain unsatisfied after fifteen working days from submitting
their written grievance, they will indicate this in writing to the Grievance
Officer. Within ten working days after
receiving such notification from complainants, the Grievance Officer will
submit the notification and the complainants' original written grievance to the
Chair of the Grievance Board.
2. If a Level
One resolution was attempted prior to the submission of a written grievance by
the complainants, within ten working days of receiving written notification
from complainants that they are unsatisfied with attempts to affect a Level One
resolution of their complaints, the Grievance Officer will submit the grievance
to the Chair of the Grievance Board.
Communications
pertaining to sexual, racial or ethnic harassment or discrimination, or
conflict of interest cases are maintained by the Chair of the Grievance
Board. Such communications include,
when appropriate, the following: copies of all written communications, the
time, date, names of participants, witnesses, the contents of any interaction
or meetings held with regard to a Level Two harassment, discrimination. or
conflict of interest case, a summary of the course of action, and the findings
of the Committee. Any of the above records
or communications maintained by the Chair of Grievance Board are confidential
and can not be released unless such release is compelled by law.
A. Composition of the Grievance Board
The
Grievance Board (hereafter, "the Board") ordinarily shall be composed
of seven faculty members and five alternates each of whom is a permanently
tenured voting faculty member holding no administrative title.*
The University encourages sexual and ethnic diversity on the Board. The initial election of members and
alternates to the Board shall take place at the Faculty Senate meeting
immediately after this provision is adopted.
The Committee on Committees will nominate a slate of candidates to the
Faculty Senate. Members of the Faculty
Senate may nominate candidates from the floor of the Faculty Senate. At the initial election, the Faculty Senate
will elect three members and two alternates to one‑year terms, two
members and two alternates to two‑year terms, and two members and one
alternate to a three year term. When
these and successive terms expire, members and alternates on the Board shall be
elected for two‑year terms.
Elections will be held yearly at the second regular meeting of the
Faculty Senate. Members of the Board
whose terms have expired are ineligible for membership on the Board for a
period of three years after the expiration of their terms. Members leaving the Board between elections
will be replaced by alternates. If at
anytime between elections the number of alternates falls below two due to
alternates replacing members who have resigned from the Board, the Committee on
Committees will nominate candidates for the alternate positions. Members of the Faculty Senate may nominate
candidates from the floor of the Faculty Senate. The Senate will elect new alternates at the first regular Faculty
Senate meeting subsequent to the number of alternates falling below two.
The
members of the Board shall elect annually a chair, a vice‑chair, and a
secretary. The business of the
committee shall be conducted according to the most recent edition of Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised,
except as described below. The quorum
for the Board of seven members during any hearing shall consist of seven
members. Should fewer than seven Board
members be present at the beginning of a hearing, the Board shall elect a
replacement from the alternates. This
alternate shall serve for the duration of the hearing.
When
the Board is convened to consider a grievance those Board members who hold an
appointment in the complainants' or respondents' academic unit, those who
reasonably expect to be called to provide evidence during the hearing, and
those who have a conflict of interest are disqualified from participation in
the hearing. In addition, both
complainants and respondents may disqualify one member of the Board without
cause. If any members of the Board are
disqualified, the remaining members will elect replacements from the
alternates. If no further alternates
are available the Chair of the Faculty will select additional alternates to
allow the Board to conduct its business.
B. Purposes of Hearing
The
purposes of a hearing are (i) to render findings of facts and recommendations
as to whether evidence presented to the Board during the hearing sustains the
complainants' allegations against the respondents, (ii) to communicate in the
Board's report to the Chancellor (a) the Board's finding and the reasons that
support this finding, and (b) the Board's recommendations regarding resolution
of the complaint. Given the avenues of
appeal provided to faculty members in the ECU
Faculty Manual, Appendix D. and
in the UNC Code, actions by the University based upon the findings of the Grievance
Board are final only when the Chancellor renders her or his opinion, and the
respondents fail to challenge either the Board's findings or the Chancellor's
concurrence or actions based on the Board's findings in the manner provided in
the ECU Faculty Manual, Appendix D.
C. Conduct of
Hearing
It
is important to note at the outset that in cases where the Grievance Board's
findings constitute part or all of the basis for a faculty member's being
reduced in rank, suspended, or terminated from employment, the faculty member
holding the protection of permanent tenure can require a hearing before the Due
Process Committee. A hearing before the
Due Process Committee affords faculty members the right to be represented by
attorneys who participate in the hearing procedure.
Similarly,
in cases where the Grievance Board's findings are part or all of the basis for
the Chancellor's taking disciplinary actions against a faculty member that do
not include reduction in rank, suspension, or termination of employment, the
faculty member has the right to a hearing before the Faculty Grievance
Committee.
The
hearing before the Grievance Board shall be conducted in private. Attendance at the hearing is limited to:
members of the Board; the complainants and one person who may advise the
complainants but shall not take an active part in the proceedings; the
respondents and one person who may advise the respondents but shall not take an
active part in the proceedings.
Witnesses shall not be present throughout the hearing, but will be
available at a convenient location, and will be called to appear before the
Board at times specified by the Board.
Any witnesses willing to testify who were made known to the Board either
by the complainants or by the respondents will be allowed to testify before the
Board.
In
conducting its hearing the Board may call witnesses. The Board may seek the assistance of the University attorney in
obtaining statements from persons who will not be present at the hearing. Such statements will be submitted to the
Board for consideration during the hearing.
In making its determination, the Board shall consider only such evidence
as is considered during the hearing.
The Board may use its own judgment in deciding the admissibility and/or
relevance of any testimony of any person before the Board, and the admissibility
and/or relevance of any evidence whatsoever.
D. Hearing Procedure
Within
ten working days of receiving a complaint from the Grievance Officer, the Board
chair shall notify respondents by registered mail, return receipt requested of
the time and place the Board will convene, and shall provide respondents with a
copy of the complaint against them.* The Board shall initiate a hearing no later than
thirty working days after the date notification was received by
respondents. Complainants or
respondents may request in writing a thirty day postponement of the
Hearing. The postponement shall be
granted if a majority of the Board agrees that exceptional circumstances
justify postponement. Having set a
date, time and place for the hearing, the Board shall within twenty‑five
working days before the hearing notify the complainants, respondents, known
witnesses and Grievance Officer of the time, date, and place of the hearing.
Fifteen
working days prior to the Board's convening, complainants and respondents shall
identify in writing individuals who may provide evidence to the Board, and
shall provide the Board with any written or other material they wish entered as
evidence. Ten working days prior to the
hearing, the Board shall provide respondents with a copy of the list of
witnesses for the complainants, and with a copy of any depositions or other
written material, and/or a description of any other evidence the complainants
have submitted to the Board. Seven
working days prior to the hearing, the Board shall provide the complainants
with a copy of the list of witnesses for the respondents, and with a copy of
any depositions or other written material, and/or a description of any other
evidence that respondents have submitted to the Board. At any time prior to the presentation of
closing statements by complainants and respondents, complainants and
respondents may request in writing that the Board allow new witnesses to
testify, or new evidence be submitted to the Board. Such requests shall be granted if they are deemed relevant by a
majority of the Board. When the Board
votes to accept new witnesses or evidence, the names of these witnesses and/or
copies or descriptions of evidence shall be supplied to the complainants or
respondents as soon as possible.
The
hearing shall begin with an opening statement by the Chair of the Board. This statement shall identify the purpose of
the hearing, the contents of the complaint, the identity of complainants, respondents, and witnesses to
be called, and the procedures to be followed during the hearing. The Board shall specifically note that only
testimony and other information clearly bearing on the grievance at hand shall
be admissible as evidence. It shall be
the Chair's responsibility to reject immediately, stop the presentation or
introduction of, or question the relevance of information having no clear
bearing on the grievance. However, at
any time during a hearing the Board may, by a majority vote, override the
Chair's decision regarding admissibility and/or relevance of testimony, written
evidence, or other material presented to the Board. It shall also be the chair's responsibility to maintain control
of the Hearing so that an orderly exchange of information can be accomplished. For any hearing from which an appeal may be
taken, a court reporter must be used to record and transcribe the hearing. (Faculty Senate Resolution #03-37, October
2003)
Following
the opening statement by the Board Chair, the Board shall then call upon both
parties to present their opening statements, beginning with the complainants. After both parties have presented their
opening statements, the Board shall allow each party, beginning with the
complainants, to submit evidence to the Board.
The Board shall call witnesses, beginning with witnesses for the
complainants. When a witness has
presented her or his statement, if any, the Board may question the
witness. After the Board has exhausted
its initial questions for the witness, the complainants, and then the
respondents may further question the witness.
After this questioning, the Board may ask further questions of the
witness. When neither the complainants,
respondents, nor the Board has further questions for a witness, that witness
shall be excused. If deemed appropriate
by a majority of the Board, dismissed witnesses may be recalled. After all witness have been dismissed,
members of the Board may direct questions to complainants and respondents. Complainants and respondents may present
rebuttal to any and all depositions, written documents and other evidence submitted
to the Board. When all witness have
been dismissed, and the Board has no further questions for either complainants
or respondents, and neither party has any further questions for one another or
for the Board, or the Chair or Board determines that the two parties should
discontinue questioning one another, each party shall be allowed to present a
closing statement, beginning with the complainants. After both parties have made closing statements, the Board shall
dismiss both parties. At this time either
the Board shall begin its deliberations on whether it sustains or does not
sustain the grievance brought before it,
or will adjourn for no more than two working days, at which time it will
meet to determine whether it sustains or does not sustain the grievance.
In
reaching its decisions the Board shall consider only the testimony and other
materials entered or presented as evidence during the hearing. The complainants shall have the burden of
proof by the greater weight of the evidence that sexual, racial, or ethnic
harassment or discrimination, or a conflict of interest as defined in
university policies has occurred.
Determination
by the Board that sustains the grievance of sexual, racial, or ethnic harassment or discrimination, or conflict of
interest brought before the Board requires a four‑sevenths vote by
members of the Board. (The exact vote
of the Board will be reported to the Chancellor along with the Board's summary
stating the basis for its determination.)
E. Disciplinary Action
Within
ten working days of the Board's reaching a determination to sustain or not to
sustain a grievance of sexual, racial, or ethnic harassment or discrimination,
or conflict of interest against East Carolina University faculty members, or
administrators with faculty status, the Board's determination and a summary of
the basis for its decision will be communicated in writing to the complainants,
the respondents, the Grievance Officer, the relevant unit administrator, the
University attorney, and the Chancellor. The Board shall provide the faculty member and the chancellor with
a copy of the court reporter’s transcript of the hearing. (Faculty Senate Resolution #03-37, October
2003)
Within
thirty working days of receiving the Board's report, the Chancellor shall
notify the complainants, respondents, Grievance Officer, relevant unit
administrator, and University attorney of the Chancellor's concurrence or
nonconcurrence with the findings of the Board, and of the disciplinary action,
if any, being taken against the respondents.
F. Appeal of a Level Two Grievance Finding
If
the Board does not sustain the complainants' grievance, and the Chancellor
concurs with the Board's findings, the Chancellor's decision shall be final,
except that the decision may be appealed pursuant to Section 501 (C) (4) of the UNC Code.
If
the Board sustains the complainants grievance, and the Chancellor does not
concur with the Board, the complainants may appeal the Chancellor's decision
pursuant to Section 501 (C) (4) of the UNC
Code.
If
the Chancellor sustains the complainants' grievance:
1. when the disciplinary actions taken by the
Chancellor, if any, do not include reduction in rank, suspension, or dismissal,
the respondents may request a hearing before the Faculty Grievance Committee,
in accordance with the procedures specified in the ECU Faculty Manual, Appendix D.
2. when the
disciplinary actions taken by the Chancellor, if any, include reduction in rank,
suspension, or dismissal, the Chancellor or his or her delegate shall send the
faculty member by register mail, return receipt requested, a written statement
of the disciplinary actions taken by the Chancellor. The statement shall include notice of the faculty members right,
upon request, to both written specification of the reasons for the intended
action and to a hearing before the Due Process Board, in accordance with the
procedures specified in the ECU Faculty
Manual, Appendix D.
*Hereinafter, the term "administrative title" refers to
appointment as department chair in a professional school, unit administrator,
dean, assistant or associate dean, vice chancellor, assistant or associate vice
chancellor, chancellor, assistant or associate chancellor.
* The office of
the appropriate Vice Chancellor shall provide financial support to the Board.