EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY

2004-2005 FACULTY SENATE

The fifth regular meeting of the 2004/2005 Faculty Senate will be held on

Tuesday, January 25, 2005, at 2:10 in the Mendenhall Student Center Great Room. 

 

FULL AGENDA

  I.           Call to Order

 

II.                      Approval of Minutes

 

               December 7, 2004

 

III.           Special Order of the Day

 

               A.     Roll Call


B.     Announcements

               C.     Steve Ballard, Chancellor

                        Reports on Faculty Employment including Longitudinal Profile of Faculty Tenure Status and

                        Tenure Status of Permanent and Temporary Faculty by Unit

 

               D.     John Lehman, Interim Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Studies

               E.     Moment in History, Henry Ferrell

 

               F.      Jeff Passe, UNC Faculty Assembly Chair

 

               G.     Catherine Rigsby, Chair of the Faculty

 

H.     Ad Hoc Strategic Planning Committee for International Affairs,
Seodial Deena and Rick Niswander

         Report on the Internationalization Goals for 2009 and a Plan for Achieving Them

         (attachment 1.)

 

               I.       Question Period

 

 IV.         Unfinished Business

 

V.                   Report of Committees

 

                A.    University Curriculum Committee, Timothy Hudson

Curriculum matters contained in the minutes of the December 9, 2004, and January 13, 2005, meetings.

 

                B.    Committee on Committees, Henry Ferrell

1.         Nominees for two delegates and two alternates to the UNC Faculty Assembly (attachment 2).

                        2.         Nominee for alternate position on the Faculty Grievance Committee (attachment 3).

 

C.        Educational Policies and Planning Committee, Charles Hodson

Request to change the name of the Department of Industrial Technology to the Department of Technology Systems.          

 

D.        Academic Standards Committee, George Bailey

1.         Proposed Revised Peer Review Instrument to include Review of Distance Education

Courses (attachment 4).

2.         Proposed Revised Goals of the Liberal Arts Foundations Curriculum (attachment 5).

 

 

VI.                 New Business

 

               Resolution on Graduation with Distinction, Mohammad Tabrizi (attachment 6).

 


______________________________________________

 

Attachment 1.

 

AD HOC STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

Report on the Internationalization Goals for 2009 and a Plan for Achieving Them

 

Introduction

Charge 

In January, 2004, Interim Vice Chancellor James LeRoy Smith created the Ad Hoc Strategic Planning Committee for International Affairs and named us as its members.  His charge to us was:

 

“[E]xamine where we are right now with respect to our several international programs: what are our strengths, weaknesses and opportunities.  I then ask you to determine a set of realistic goals that we should achieve by 2009 and to devise a plan of action whereby we can achieve those goals.  In particular, I hope that the Committee will look into such important areas as study abroad opportunities for our students; the size and character of our international student body; our linkages with sister universities overseas; the global interests and experience of our faculty; the internationalization of the curriculum; and indeed possibilities for internationalizing the very fiber of the University.” 

 

Dr. Smith asked that we examine these several topics over Spring Term and that we give to him by May 15, 2004, a report detailing our recommendations.  This document is that report.

 

Our intent is to provide a blueprint whereby, over the next five years, the University might better enable students, faculty, staff, and indeed the wider community to become more aware about the world in which we live.  Our blueprint indicates ways in which the University’s people might gain the knowledge and skills to be effective global citizens.  More to the point our document outlines a series of steps to develop at ECU a truly international campus culture.

 

The Timeliness of Our Report

We are not alone in seeking to internationalize a campus culture.  Since 9/11, colleges and universities throughout the nation have placed high priority on international education.   In preparing our report, we have profited from the thinking and experience of others. In particular we have benefited from the advice of colleagues in the UNC Office of the President and at several of our sister UNC institutions.  Indeed, our Report, like so many others in the University System, is a conscious response to "Strategic Direction 5: Internationalization" that was adopted by the UNC Board of Governors (BOG) in January 2002 and recently reaffirmed in the BOG’s Long-Range Plan 2004-2009.   The aim of that Strategic Direction is to “[p]romote an international perspective throughout the University community to prepare citizens to become leaders in a multi-ethnic and global society."  We are indebted to the Board for its leadership in this important area, and we are grateful for the assistance of the Office of the President in helping us create our ECU response.  In particular, we relied heavily on UNC Senior Vice President Gretchen Bataille's paper, "Internationalization and the University of North Carolina."  

 

Our report is timely in other respects as well.  We write just as ECU is developing its next Five-Year Plan covering the period 2004 to 2009.  Indeed, our document is designed to form an important part of the Five-Year Plan for the Division of Academic Affairs.   We seek to elaborate on several of the goals cited in the Academic Affairs Strategic Plan of February, 2004, notably: AA#2 “Expand opportunities for ECU students to study abroad”; AA#4 “Investigate and support development of international education and global initiatives”; AA#15 “Foster and develop diversity through effective hiring and student recruitment”; AA#16 ”Expand and diversify ECU’s international student population”; and AA#17 “Expand undergraduate and graduate D[istance] E[ducation] offerings.”

 

The document was also written with an eye toward defining a more useful role for the ECU Office of International Affairs (OIA).  The Office is now at a crossroads.  Particularly over the past few years it has been buffeted a great deal; some have even suggested that it has lost its sense of direction.   It is time that we examine and redefine its role in the internationalization process, clearly identifying those tasks which are and are not the responsibility of the OIA.  Equipped with a better understanding of the Office’s role, we can more intelligently begin the search for a permanent Director of International Affairs.  It is our hope that

 

within the next five years the OIA will be so successful and international affairs so important a campus activity that the Director of the Office will merit the title of Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs.

 

The Meaning of Internationalization. 

We define internationalization in the same way as does UNESCO, the International Association of Universities, and many campuses including our sister University in Greensboro.   Internationalization is "a range of activities, policies, and services that integrate an international and intercultural dimension into the teaching, research, and service functions of the institution." [Jane Knight, "Internationalization: Management Strategies and Issues," International Education Magazine, IX, 1 (1993), pp. 6, 21, and 22].   This definition gives clear indication that the international aspects of the university can no longer be compartmentalized into discrete departments, centers, and programs.  Rather, internationalization must touch on all aspects of the campus and inform its several functions.  Internationalization should permeate, in the words of Dr. Smith’s charge, “the very fiber of the University.”

 

The Purpose and Structure of this Document. 

The purpose of this document is to outline a series of goals to be achieved by the year 2009.  We recommend that these goals be interpreted within the context of the University Plan, 2004-09.  For each goal we outline a series of strategies for its achievement, and then a set of benchmarks by which progress toward achievement might be measured.

 

Five Goals for 2009

 

Goal One: To Incorporate International Education into the University's Mission Statement. 

No doubt in response to the BOG’s Strategic Direction 5, over half of the institutions in the UNC System now include some reference in their Mission Statements to international education or global awareness.  Unfortunately, ECU is not among those institutions, and that should be corrected forthwith.  ECU’s Mission Statement needs to indicate briefly but clearly that the University is committed to international education, and that internationalization is an institutional goal. 

 

Strategy.  To accomplish this objective, we recommend that:

¨      International education be included in the Mission Statement.  The Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs should request the ECU Advisory Committee for International Programs to review the current Mission Statement and make recommendations of appropriate wording to be incorporated in it.   Benchmark:  This task should be completed by May, 2005.

 

Goal Two: To Expand and Diversify Overseas Opportunities for ECU Students. 

While ECU may be justly proud of its numerous summer study abroad programs, the University’s semester and year-long study abroad options are another story.  Over the past five years we have witnessed a steady decline in the number of ECU students participating in academic year abroad programs, particularly student exchange programs.  That is particularly disturbing because UNC institutions—as a result of their extremely low in-state tuition and fees—are admirably positioned to offer extremely cost-effective student swap programs.  Other institutions in the System capitalize upon that advantage, and we should as well.  Getting our numbers up is clearly the responsibility of the Office of International Affairs, and this ought to be top priority for that office.

 

Strategies.  We recommend several strategies to achieve this goal:

¨      Increase twenty-fold the number of ECU students participating in international swap programs.   That is not as ambitious a goal as it sounds because we start from such a low base.  This year (2003-04), only fifteen ECU students went overseas on student swap arrangements.  It would be ambitious but not unrealistic to increase that number to 300 by 2009.  Other UNC institutions much smaller than ECU regularly send overseas over that number every year, and indeed five years ago ECU itself sent almost 40 students annually on international exchange.  We need to get back on track.  Benchmarks: The Office of International Affairs, working with faculty, the administration, and development will increase the numbers of students going on study abroad by 60 in each of the five years, 2004-09 so that by 2009 300 students will be on academic term and academic year study abroad.

 

¨      Enlarge the endowment to provide travel grants for study abroad participants.  To achieve the numbers indicated in the previous paragraph the OIA should have a larger endowment, at least $2 million more than we have now, that would provide travel funds to enable more students to go on study abroad.  The creation of such an endowment is quite feasible as has been shown by the success of our sister institutions in the UNC system in raising sizeable funds for this purpose.  Indeed we already have in place the Rivers Endowment and the funding in the EC Scholars program that is now earmarked to support Study Abroad. But we need more resources.  Benchmarks:  In close cooperation with University Development and as part of the upcoming Centennial Capital Campaign, OIA should aim to raise an average of $400,000 in each of the next five years.

 

¨      Expand our linkages with overseas universities.  The mechanism that enables most international student swaps is the bilateral exchange agreement.  At one time or other, ECU had 40 such agreements with partners all over the world.  By the end of 2003, we were down to only five active agreements.   If we are to be successful in sending students (and indeed faculty as well) overseas, we should plan over the next five years to establish at least five new and active agreements each year so that we have at least 30 new agreements by 2009.  Benchmarks:   ECU should negotiate and sign five new bilateral student exchange agreements with overseas partners in each of the next five years.

 

¨      Initiate exchange programs with new countries and regions.  There has been an unfortunate tendency at ECU (as well as at many other institutions) simply to respond to initial student demand rather than to build new interests.  Thus, ECU has over the years sent a disproportionate number of students to such places as Australia and the United Kingdom.  But the world is a bigger place and we need to exert some leadership to entice students (perhaps with the offer of additional Rivers or other scholarship money) to take the less-well-traveled paths to such destinations as Brazil, China, Japan, Central and Eastern Europe, and the Middle East.  Benchmarks:  Of the five new bilateral agreements to be signed each year from 2004-2009, at least two should be with institutions outside Western Europe.

 

¨      Increase participation in ISEP and the UNC-EP.   While we recommend that priority be placed upon the expansion of our bilateral student exchange programs, we ought also to take full advantage of two important student swap programs in which ECU participates.   One is the International Student Exchange Program, or ISEP; the other is the University of North Carolina Exchange Program, or UNC-EP.  Both are tuition and fee (and in ISEP’s case room and board as well) swap programs.  Thus they are comparable in cost to bilateral programs.  Our participation in these programs has been in steady decline over the last five years: this year, we sent only three students on the UNC-EP program, and one on ISEP.  We should reverse this decline and resolve to send at least ten students per year on each program in each of the next five years.  Benchmarks:  Over the period 2004-09, ECU will send each year ten students overseas on ISEP and the UNC-EP.

 

¨      Create new, cost-effective, study abroad options.  While the heart of ECU’s study abroad program will remain the exchange program, we should not rely solely on that mechanism alone.  For example, the ECU Department of Foreign Languages relies on our participation in the cost-effective Consortium programs organized by UNC-Wilmington and UNC-Charlotte to get its language students to, respectively, France and Spain.  Programs like these should continue, and perhaps we might look to other, equally economical--although non-exchange--options for groups of ECU students to study abroad.  For example, we might send our students to Mexico in cooperation with the North Carolina Center for International Understanding, a unit of the UNC System.  We recommend the development of two new such programs by 2009.  Benchmarks: ECU will create one new, cost-effective, non-exchange training site by 2006, and another by 2008.

 

¨      Expand summer abroad options.  The bright spot in ECU study abroad has been the vibrancy of our summer programs.  Last summer (2003), 176 students went overseas on a dozen programs.  The success of those programs was primarily due to the enthusiasm and dedication of the 16 ECU faculty members who organized and led them, sometimes in the face of bureaucratic hurdles that would discourage lesser spirits.  While we do recommend that considerable attention be paid to our student swap programs—because that is where the needs are most critical—we hardly wish to leave the impression that our emphasis in that area implies a diminished interest in summer programs.  There is a place for each in ECU study abroad; they are not in competition.  The need to get more ECU students overseas is so great that we should employ and expand all opportunities.  Benchmarks:  Increase the number of summer study abroad programs by two in each of the next five years so that an additional ten will be added by 2009 as to increase overall student participation to 250.

 

¨      Establish new internship and service learning opportunities overseas. We recommend that a new kind of overseas experience—internships in overseas companies and service learning in international organizations—be added to the store of student opportunities.  To be sure the establishment of such a new program is fraught with difficulty: placement of our students in internships and service learning positions is hard enough in the United States, let alone overseas.  But for some programs—international business is one, the MAIS is another—international internships are a necessity.  Benchmarks: From 2004-09, we should place five ECU students per year in internships in overseas environments. 

 

Goal Three:  To Increase and Diversify ECU’s International Student Population.

The number of international students on the ECU campus remains embarrassingly small.  In Fall Term, 2003, we counted 188 international students (degree-seeking and exchange)—a mere .85% of our total student enrollment of 22,000.  To give a little comparison, among our 15 peer institutions, the average international student population is around 850, representing an average of 4.6% of total enrollment (please see Appendix I).  If 4.6% of ECU’s current enrollment were international students, we would have an international student population of just over 1,000.  Getting to such a number will take some time, but surely we can get at least half way there over the next five years.  Numbers alone are not the whole story, of course.  We should also take steps to diversify our foreign student population and make better use of it as an educational resource.  The campus unit that should lead the recruitment (and retention) effort is the Office of International Affairs.  It should bear the primary responsibility for implementing all of the following strategies.

 

Strategies.  To accomplish these objectives we propose to:

¨      Increase the number of degree-seeking international students to 500.   In Fall Term, 2003, ECU had 159 degree-seeking international students: 50 undergraduates and 109 graduate students.  The main reason why our numbers are so low is that, hitherto, we have been reactive rather than proactive in international student recruitment.  We recommend a change in that approach and ask that the Office of International Affairs, in close cooperation with the Undergraduate Admissions and the Graduate School, embark on an ambitious and vigorous marketing and recruitment campaign.   Benchmarks:  The degree-seeking international student population should be increased to 199 by Fall Term 2004; 259 by Fall Term 2005; 336 by Fall Term 2006; 420, Fall Term 2007; and 500 by Fall Term 2008.

 

¨      Increase the Number of International Exchange Students on the ECU campus.   As indicated in the section on study abroad, we advocate an expansion of ECU’s various international student swap programs such that 300 ECU students will be participants by 2009.  One of the great benefits of such swap programs is that they bring to our campus an equal number of international exchange students.  Thus, in expanding our swap programs for ECU students, we improve our international student numbers as well.  Benchmarks:  The number of international exchange students coming to ECU should increase by 60 in each of the next five years until 300 are enrolled by 2009.

 

¨      Create an Intensive English Language Program on the ECU Campus.   To assist in recruitment, we need an Intensive English Language Program (IELP).  We recommend that a reputable IELP (such as the INTERLINK Language Centers that operates on five U.S. campuses including UNC-Greensboro) be invited to set up and run our program.  The benefits would be many: an experienced IELP can help in our recruitment efforts; in connection with it we can offer such attractive options as the institutional TOEFL and conditional admissions; and the program would add at least 35 students to our international student population.   Benchmarks:  Open an Intensive English Language Program on the ECU campus by Fall Term 2005, and assist its growth so that by 2009 it would enroll at least 35 students.

 

¨      Diversify the international student body.  We ought not to be obsessed with numbers alone.  We should also be concerned with the diversification of our international student body.  Of the 159 degree-seeking international students enrolled in Fall Term 2003, 62 (39%) came from only two countries: China and India.  Likewise, 80% of our incoming exchange students are from Europe.  We lag in student representation from the Caribbean and Central and South America, and host only a handful of students from the Middle East and Africa.  While much of this picture is determined by economic and political circumstances beyond our control, we could still take steps—for example, by implementing the proposed Graduate School Support Plan--to provide financial aid to needy international students.  We should aim to increase to 100 by 2009 the number of international students coming from less-represented world areas.  Benchmarks:  In each of the five years 2004-09 increase by 20 per year the number of students from the Caribbean, Central and South America, the Middle East, and Africa.

 

¨      Make better use of international students as an educational resource.  The reason we want more international students on our campus is not for tuition dollars.  Rather, it is because of the tremendous educational opportunity that they present to our students, faculty, and community.  Up until recently, however, ECU has not done a very good job in deriving educational benefit from its international students.  We applaud recent efforts to reverse things: the new Honors/International Students’ dormitory that will open in fall 2005; the Office of International Affairs’ weekly gatherings of international and American students that started last fall; the international festival held in April 2004.  But we can do more. We could, for instance, utilize foreign students as language informants; create programs of outreach into the local schools and into New North Carolinian immigrant groups; and make better use of our international graduates who could assist in recruitment activities overseas.  Benchmarks: In each year, 2004 to 2009, add one new international-student learning program.


Goal Four: To Internationalize the ECU Faculty and Staff. 

Faculty members who have spent time overseas invariably incorporate an international perspective into their teaching and research.  Such faculty members also become firm advocates for internationalization throughout the University and enthusiastic volunteers for all kinds of international projects.  If internationalization is an institutional priority, it is crucial to invest in the faculty.   As is indicated below, the Office of International Affairs should bear the responsibility for implementing some of the following strategies while other campus bodies should take the lead with respect to the others.

 

Strategies.  We recommend several strategies for internationalizing the faculty:

¨      Provide intramural support for faculty to get international experience.  The University must provide opportunity for faculty to acquire international experience.   Indeed, international contacts by our faculty would increase ECU’s visibility that, among other things, would aid in international student recruitment.  At the very least, there should be a budget within the Office of International Affairs that would enable faculty to travel overseas to inspect study abroad sites, to explore international linkage possibilities, to attend professional meetings in other countries, etc.  An annual budget of, say, $50,000 would enable 50 faculty members to go overseas each year.    Benchmarks: In each of the five years 2004-08, OIA should support 50 faculty members going overseas so that by 2009 upwards of 250 faculty members will have had the opportunity to gain international experience.

 

¨      Triple the number of ECU faculty members receiving Fulbright and other such awards.   While short visits are better than nothing, the best kind of international exposure is an extended period of work and residence abroad; and there are several fellowship opportunities (Fulbright, NATO, NSF, DAAD, Rotary, etc.) that can provide support for such in-depth experiences.  On average, ECU faculty receive only three such awards per year.  We should triple that number by 2009.  To get there, we should encourage and reward participation in such programs, and reduce the bureaucratic impediments that too often deter faculty from pursuing—or even accepting--such awards.  The OIA, working with ECU’s Fulbright Committee, should take the lead in promoting Fulbright and similar programs.  Benchmarks: In each of the years 2004-09, OIA should aim to increase the number of Fulbright and similar grants to faculty by one to two per year, until by 2009 we average at least nine such awards annually.

 

¨      Establish an international faculty swap program.   While it is always pleasant to receive a Fulbright award, external funding is not a sine qua non for faculty exchange.   Much can be done simply by rechanneling existing resources.  In this regard, ECU should institute by this coming year (2004-05) a faculty exchange program whereby our faculty may swap places for an academic term or year with colleagues in universities overseas.  Each would retain his or her regular salary and benefits while on exchange; thus the lion’s share of the costs of the program would be covered by existing resources.  Once the program is up and running (in academic year 2005-06) we should aim to have three ECU faculty on faculty swaps each year.  OIA should bear the responsibility for creating and conducting this program.  Benchmarks:   Establish the faculty swap program in AY 2004-05, and do three swaps per year thereafter, thus providing a total of twelve such exchanges by 2009.

 

¨      Increase the number and make better use of international visiting scholars.  One added benefit of a faculty swap program is that it would bring to campus more visiting scholars that have expertise in regions where our resources are thin. This year (2003-04), ECU plays host to 13 visiting scholars from overseas.  We should increase the number of such scholars by 100% (to 26) by the year 2009.  Equally important, we should develop programs to make better use of these faculty members as an educational resource by asking them—as a condition of our hosting them--to make presentations to ECU and Eastern North Carolina organizations, meet with faculty and student groups, etc., to inform our community about their home countries and regions.  That is particularly true of the Rivers Visiting Professorship.  It should be revitalized by making it adhere more closely to the original intent of the program.  We call on the OIA to organize these efforts.  Benchmarks:  In each of the five years 2004-09, we should increase the number of visiting scholars on the ECU campus by two to three per year, until by 2009 26 are resident on campus.

 

¨      Provide awards that encourage faculty excellence in international education.  Right after the institution endorses internationalization in its Mission Statement, we ask that it then establish annual awards to honor faculty who have contributed significantly in the international arena.  We are thinking of perhaps a Chancellor’s Prize for Excellence in International Education, and perhaps even separate awards for teaching and for research.  That would be a clear message to faculty that ECU is committed to the globalization effort.  Benchmarks:  Beginning in 2005,   ECU should annually award one internationally-related award in teaching and another in research.

 

¨      Consider evidence of global awareness as a factor in hiring new faculty.  One cost-effective way to increase faculty awareness of international matters is to include evidence of it as one of the factors considered in new faculty hiring.  In allocating positions, administrators should give attention to world regions (e.g., Middle and South America and the Middle East) in which faculty expertise is thin.  In some fields evidence of international expertise might be a key criterion.  In others, it might be used more subtly, such as a determining factor when all other things seem equal.   However the criterion is applied, we urge departments and search committees to take an awareness of international matters into account in their future hiring, and even to advertise position openings in overseas publications.  Benchmark: We ask that this proposal be discussed in the Deans Council sometime during Academic Year 2004-05, and if there is agreement on our recommendation, we ask that the Council work towards its implementation as soon thereafter as practicable.

 

¨      Consider international experience as one criterion in promotion and tenure decisions.   We recommend that–should a candidate choose to cite it in his or her dossier--international experience become one of the evidences of quality (within of course the traditional categories of Research, Teaching, and Service) that determine promotion and tenure. We ask the Faculty Senate (or some other body deemed appropriate by Senate leadership) to study the feasibility of this recommendation; and, if the recommendation is accepted, we ask that units and departments be encouraged to implement it. Benchmark: During 2004-05, we ask the Senate to review the proposal that international experience be considered in the process of determining promotion and tenure.

 

¨      Increase the number of externally-funded international projects to five.  Some enterprising ECU faculty have had considerable success in applying for federal grants to support international programs (notably the several programs supporting exchanges with Russia and Eastern Europe, and those funding exchanges with Japan).  But we can do better.   ECU should aim to have, by 2009, at least five different, federally-funded, international projects with a combined dollar value of at least $1 million.   While the Office of International Affairs and the Office of Sponsored Research can and should be supportive of this effort, the pursuit and execution of such grants, as well as the reaping of benefits from successful applications, should remain faculty prerogatives.  Benchmarks:  In each of the years from 2004-09, ECU faculty should aim to receive at least one new federal grant in support of the international activities.

 

¨      Establish an international staff swap program.  The process of internationalizing ECU ought not to neglect the ECU staff--the people who house our international students, deal with foreign credit and credentials, expedite faculty travel requests, etc.   As they are very much part of the institution’s internationalization effort, we should provide them with a program, administered by the OIA, to gain an international perspective.   Likewise, it would be very useful for staff from our overseas partners, who deal with ECU faculty and students on a regular basis, to become acquainted with how we do things in Greenville.  Benchmarks:  By Spring Term 2005, and in cooperation with our overseas partners, OIA should have in place a staff swap program involving at least two key staff members each way each year, so that by 2009 eight ECU staff members will have participated in the program.

 

Goal Five: To Promote More Global Awareness through the ECU Curriculum.

It would be wonderful if all ECU students could study abroad for a semester or a full academic year, but the reality is that for the foreseeable future the great majority of our students will not have that experience.  For them, it is primarily the curriculum offered at the home campus in Greenville that will provide that global awareness so necessary in the twenty-first century.  While the current ECU curriculum has much strength in international education, it can and ought to be improved.  That improvement should build on existing strengths, while simultaneously expanding proactively into other areas, especially non-western ones that have been relatively neglected or marginalized. The overall goal is to provide ECU students with a balanced curriculum addressing the diversity of the world, traditional and modern.   As the Office of International Affairs is an administrative unit, it would be improper for it to play a leadership role in curricular change and development.  Rather, as the curriculum is a faculty concern, we look to the faculty to achieve this goal.

 

Strategies. To internationalize the curriculum we propose the following courses of action:

¨      Create within Academic Affairs a Committee on International Curricular Initiatives (CICI).     If progress in globalizing the curriculum is to be made, the effort needs a structure and strong leadership; and for reasons just stated, it would be improper for the OIA to lead the charge.  We therefore suggest the establishment of a Committee on International Curricular Initiatives, or CICI.  The Committee should include faculty with recognized international expertise.  It should report to Academic Affairs and be designed to work on curriculum development in international education, particularly as it cuts across departmental, school and college lines.  It would also take leadership in seeking external funding for international education initiatives.  It is essential that the Chair of the Committee be a respected member of the ECU faculty, hold senior rank, receive sufficient released time, and have adequate administrative support.  He or she would work with dean-appointed, international education coordinators located in each of the Colleges.  Their task would be to coordinate the efforts of their respective Colleges to internationalize the curriculum with the overall, University-wide effort. Further work of the new Committee, its Chair and the coordinators is described in the following strategies.  Benchmarks:  By December, 2004, Academic Affairs should create a Committee on International Curricular Initiatives, provide the Chair of that Committee with resources to implement its recommendations, and identify international coordinators for each of the Colleges. 

 

¨      Broaden ECU’s offerings in international interdisciplinary programs.   One of CICI’s most important tasks will be to encourage the creation of   interdisciplinary programs focusing on hitherto-neglected world areas--Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East--and the expansion of the existing program in Russian Studies and the recently-approved interdisciplinary minor in Asian Studies.  Where feasible, each program should have a director and draw on faculty expertise from throughout the University.  As far as possible, those programs should be established or expanded with external funding and the CICI should assist them in questing after appropriate grants.  Benchmarks: Working with faculty groups the CICI will seek external support such that, by 2009, at least two new area studies programs are established and existing programs are significantly expanded. 

 

¨      Integrate and expand the teaching of foreign languages and cultures.  We recommend that academic departments and programs be encouraged to incorporate foreign language and cultural studies courses taught by the Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, working responsively with the curricular needs of those department and programs. We also urge that departments and programs be encouraged to incorporate internationally-related courses offered throughout the University, as well as study abroad opportunities, into their curricula.   In turn, we recommend that the Department of Foreign Languages expand or establish course offerings in less-commonly-taught languages such as Russian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Chinese.  In particular we urge the Department to work with UNC System-wide efforts now underway to teach the less-commonly-taught languages through Distance Education and inter-institutional registration. Benchmarks: By 2009, the Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures should expand or establish course offerings in less-commonly-taught languages utilizing distance education instruction and other means now being developed in the UNC System.

 

¨      Increase the overall number of internationally-related courses.   An important goal of CICI will be to increase the number of courses that have a significant international component.  An immediate problem in implementing this recommendation is that there are not now any clear criteria as to what constitutes an international or global course.  One of the first tasks of CICI, working with the coordinators and through them with the departments and the faculty, is to come up with such criteria.  Once they are established, CICI should go through the current catalog and identify those courses that meet the criteria.  CICI should then work with faculty so that the total number of internationally-related courses may be increased.    Benchmarks:  By May, 2005, CICI will draw up criteria to identify internationally-related courses, make an inventory of such courses in the catalog, and--beginning in fall, 2005—work with the College coordinators to increase the number.

 

¨      Internationalize the general education requirements.  We recommend that the CICI work with appropriate Faculty Senate committees, such as the Academic Standards Committee, to incorporate an international dimension into the revised general education program.  We additionally recommend that the University add a meaningful international education requirement into its future general education program.  This task will be greatly furthered once the CICI has completed its task of identifying internationally-related courses in the ECU curriculum as many of those could then be marked as courses that might satisfy such a general education requirement.  Benchmark:  As soon as is practicable, this international education requirement should be approved such that by 2009 it is in effect.

 

¨      Expand the programs in International Studies.  We recommend that the undergraduate international studies minor be expanded and upgraded to a major, and that an integrated five-year B.A./M.A. program in international studies be created. We also recommend that two new concentrations for the MAIS (International Affairs Administration and Security Studies) be established by 2006, and that enrollment in the MAIS program be increased by actively recruiting more international students into the program.   Benchmarks: The relevant program directors, assisted by the CICI, should establish an undergraduate major in international studies by 2006, an integrated five-year B.A./M.A. in international studies by 2007, and two new MAIS concentrations also by 2007.

 

¨      Utilize distance education to globalize the curriculum.  We are all proud that ECU is a leader in Distance Education, certainly in the state, and undoubtedly in the nation.  We would be remiss, therefore, if we were not to consider how distance education might assist in the effort to internationalize the curriculum.  First, we urge that some Distance Education courses be offered in conjunction with educational institutions overseas via interactive electronic technology.  Second, we recommend that Distance Education enter into consortial arrangements linking institutions via interactive technology for the teaching of less-commonly-taught languages.  Third, we urge the expansion of current efforts to use Distance Education to promote virtual cultural contact with people overseas as a way of enticing our students to think cross-culturally.  We suggest that the CICI work with colleagues in Distance Education to implement these strategies.  Benchmarks: By 2009, Distance Education should conduct courses in cooperation with institutions overseas, offer instruction in less-commonly-taught languages, and expand the existing program in virtual cross cultural training to include students in a dozen different countries.

 

Conclusion

We are pleased to have had this opportunity to think about the future of international affairs at East Carolina University.   Much needs to be done, but with careful planning, sufficient resources, and creative energy, we can achieve the ambitious goals set forth in this document.   We have the potential to assert real leadership in international education and we should go for it!  We owe it to our State, our region, and above all, our students.   Let’s get on with the task.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Tope Adeyemi-Bello, Management                             

Michael Bassman, The Honors Program                    

Beverly Harju, Psychology                                             

Holly Hapke, Geography                                               

Mohammed Kashef, Planning                          

Mary Kirkpatrick  , Nursing                                            

Paul Knepper, Human Ecology

Charles Lyons, International Affairs

Calvin Mercer, Religious Studies

Marilyn Sheerer, Education

Paul Tschetter, The Graduate School

John Tucker, History

Gay Wilentz, English & Ethnic Studies

Lester Zeager, Economics & MAIS Program

 

Appendix I

A Comparison of International Student Enrollment and the Percentage of International Students
 in Total Student Enrollment at East Carolina University and its Peer Institutions: 2001-2002

 

Institution

Total Enrollment

ISE 2001-2002

Percentage of International Students

East Carolina University

22,000

189

.85%

Indiana State University

11,714

484

4.1%

Miami University Ohio

16,300

428

2.6%

Montana State University

12,000

298

2.4%

Old Dominion University

19,627

1,366

6.9%

University of Alabama

18,000

903

5.01%

University of Central Florida

41,102

1,338

3.3%

University of Louisiana at Lafayette

16,000

601

3.7%

University of Maine

11,222

365

3.2%

University of Missouri at Kansas City

14,244

905

6.4%

University of New OrleansLouisiana

17,014

766

4.5%

University of North DakotaMain

13,034

440

3.4%

University of South Alabama

12,000

868

7.2%

University of South Dakota

8,093

158

2.0%     

Wichita State UniversityKansas

14,854

1,493

10.1%

Wright State University-Main – Ohio

15,000

539

3.6%

Average

 

 

4.3%

 

 

 

Attachment 2.

 

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES REPORT

Nominees for two delegates and two alternates to the UNC Faculty Assembly

 

 

Nominees for Faculty Assembly Delegates/Alternates 

Alice Anderson, Allied Health Sciences

Charles Boklage, Medicine

John Cope, Psychology

Steve Estes, Health and Human Performance

Edson Justiniano, Physics

Brenda Killingsworth, Business

Ralph Scott, Academic Library Services

Janice Tovey, English

David Weismiller, Medicine

 

Current UNC Faculty Assembly Delegates for East Carolina University

                                                                                         

Name

Academic Unit

Term

Catherine Rigsby

Geology

2005*

Brenda Killingsworth

Business

2005

John Cope

Psychology

2005

Bob Morrison

Chemistry

2006

Dee Dee Glascoff

Health & Human Performance

2007

 

*The Chair of the Faculty term begins and ends with term in office.

 

Current UNC Faculty Assembly Alternates for East Carolina University

                                                                                         

Name

Academic Unit

Term

Michael Duffy

Art

2005

Mark Taggart

Music                                 

2005

James Holloway

Business

2006

Patricia Anderson

Education

2007

Steve Estes                    

Health & Human Performance

2007

 

 

 

Attachment 3.

 

 

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES REPORT

Nominee for alternate position on the Faculty Grievance Committee

 

                Nominee for vacant alternate position:    Mark Taggart, School of Music

 

REGULAR MEMBERS (with vote)

Name

Academic / Administrative Area

Term

Office Location

Tele #

Myra Brown

Allied Health Sciences - Associate

2005

Belk Annex 304-A

328-4436

Michael Schinasi

Foreign Languages - Associate

2005

Bate 3309

328-6534

Cathy Hall    Secretary

Psychology - Professor

2005

Rawl 214

328-6498

Sudesh Kataria

Medicine – Professor

2006

Brody 3E-130A

744-3198

Henry Ferrell    Vice Chair

History - Professor

2006

Brewster A-317

328-6326

John Cope

Psychology – Associate

2006

Rawl 110

328-6497

Gene Hughes         Chair  

Business - Professor

2007

Bate 3107

328-6026

Hanna Jubran

Art and Design – Associate

2007

Jenkins 127

328-1303

ALTERNATE MEMBERS (with vote)

open

 

2005

 

 

Steven Mark

Education - Assistant

2007

Bate 2311

328-5335

  EX-OFFICIO MEMBER (with vote)

Catherine Rigsby

Chair of the Faculty - Geology

Graham 204

328-4297

 


_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

Attachment 4.

 

ACADEMIC STANDARDS COMMITTEE REPORT

Comparison of the Current Peer Review Instrument

with Proposed Revised Instrument to Include Review of Distance Education Courses

 

Category 1: Organization

 

Current Document

Amended Peer Review Instrument

–begins class on time in an orderly, organized fashion

Begins the instructional session in a timely fashion

 

Provides needed information in a timely manner

–clearly states the goal or objective for the period

Clearly states goals or objectives for the instructional session

–reviews prior class material to prepare students for the content to be covered

Reviews prior instructional material to prepare the students for the content to be covered.

–summarizes and distills main points at the end of class

Summarizes and/or distills main points at the close of the instructional session

–presents topics in logical sequence and flow

Presents topics in logical sequence and flow

 

Category 2: Content

 

Current Document

Amended Peer Review Instrument

–selects examples relevant to student experiences/ course content

Selects examples relevant to student experiences/ course content

–presents up to date developments in the field

Presents up to date developments in the field

–answers student questions clearly and directly

Provides content for an instructional session in an organized fashion

–demonstrates command of subject matter

Demonstrates command of subject matter


Category 3: Presentation

Current Document

Amended Peer Review Instrument

–speaks audibly and clearly

Communicates clearly using chosen delivery medium

–communicates a sense of enthusiasm and excitement toward the content

Communicates a sense of enthusiasm toward the content

–presentation style facilitates note taking, if appropriate

Presentation style facilitates student learning

–selects teaching methods appropriate for the content

Selects teaching methods and instructional strategies appropriate for the content, objectives, and chosen delivery medium

–relates current course content to what’s gone before and will come after

Relates current course content to previous and subsequent content

–carefully explains assignments

Carefully explains assignments


Category 4: Rapport/Interaction

Current Document

Amended Peer Review Instrument

 

Establishes and follows established criteria for class interaction

–treats all students in a fair and equitable manner

Treats all students in a fair and equitable manner

–respects diverse points of view

Respects diverse points of view

–listens carefully to student comments and questions

 

 

Establishes an environment that encourages students’ participation and  questions

–responds constructively to student/opinions and comments

Responds constructively to students’ questions, opinions and comments

–responds to wrong answers constructively

Provides corrective feedback to wrong answers

–encourages students to answer difficult questions by providing cues and encouragement

Prompts students to answer difficult questions and solve complex problems by providing cues and encouragement

 

Facilitates student to student communication and interaction

–is able to admit error/insufficient knowledge

Is able to admit error/insufficient knowledge


Category 5: Active Learning (labs, PE activities, clinics, etc.)  OPTIONAL

Current Document

Amended Peer Review Instrument

–clearly explains directions or procedures

Clearly explains directions or procedures

–has materials and equipment necessary to complete the activity readily available

Facilitates access to materials and equipment necessary to complete the activity in a timely manner

–careful safety supervision is obvious

Explains safety procedures when warranted

–allows sufficient time for completion

Allows sufficient time for completion

 


 

 

 

Proposed Revised Peer Review Instrument to include Review of Distance Education Courses

 

Professor____________________

 

Class_________________________

Time_______________________

 

# of Students__________________

 

EAST CAROLINA PEER OBSERVATION OF TEACHING INSTRUMENT

FOR NON TENURED AND FIXED TERM FACULTY

(Peer Version)

 

Using the items below, record your observations.  Your mark(s) on or somewhere between the distinctions

 “does well” and “needs improvement” should indicate what overall assessment for the category is assigned.

 

Category 1: Organization

Needs

Improvement

Does

Well

NA/UO

Begins the instructional session in a timely fashion

 

 

 

 

 

Provides needed information in a timely manner

 

 

 

 

 

Clearly states goals or objectives for the instructional session

 

 

 

 

 

Reviews prior instructional material to prepare the students for the content to be covered.

 

 

 

 

 

Summarizes and/or distills main points at the close of the instructional session

 

 

 

 

 

Presents topics in logical sequence and flow

 

 

 

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category 2: Content

Needs

Improvement

Does

Well

NA/UO

 

Selects examples relevant to student experiences/ course content

 

 

 

 

 

Presents up to date developments in the field

 

 

 

 

 

Provides content for an instructional session in an organized fashion

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstrates command of subject matter

 

 

 

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Category 3: Presentation

Needs

Improvement

Does

Well

NA/UO

Communicates clearly using chosen delivery medium

 

 

 

 

 

Communicates a sense of enthusiasm toward the content

 

 

 

 

 

Presentation style facilitates student learning

 

 

 

 

 

Selects teaching methods and instructional strategies appropriate for the content, objectives, and chosen delivery medium

 

 

 

 

 

Relates current course content to previous and subsequent content

 

 

 

 

 

Carefully explains assignments

 

 

 

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category 4: Rapport/Interaction

 

 

Needs

Improvement

 

Does

Well

 

NA/UO

Establishes and follows established criteria for class interaction

 

 

 

 

 

Treats all students in a fair and equitable manner

 

 

 

 

 

Respects diverse points of view

 

 

 

 

 

Establishes an environment that encourages students’ participation and  questions

 

 

 

 

 

Responds constructively to students’ questions, opinions and comments

 

 

 

 

 

Provides corrective feedback to wrong answers

 

 

 

 

 

Prompts students to answer difficult questions and solve complex problems by providing cues and encouragement

 

 

 

 

 

Facilitates student to student communication and interaction

 

 

 

 

 

Is able to admit error/insufficient knowledge

 

 

 

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Category 5: Active Learning (labs, PE activities, clinics, etc.)  OPTIONAL

 

Needs

Improvement

Does

Well

NA/UO

Clearly explains directions or procedures

 

 

 

 

 

Facilitates access to materials and equipment necessary to complete the activity in a timely manner

 

 

 

 

 

Explains safety procedures when warranted

 

 

 

 

 

Allows sufficient time for completion

 

 

 

 

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NA/UO - not applicable/unable to observe

Observer________________________

Date_______

Time in___

Time out__

 

Areas of Strength:

 

 

Areas to consider for Faculty Development Plan:

 

 


Attachment 5.

 

ACADEMIC STANDARDS COMMITTEE REPORT

Proposed Revised Goals of the Liberal Arts Foundations Curriculum

 

The overarching goal of the Liberal Arts Foundations Curriculum is to provide students with the fundamental knowledge and abilities essential to their living worthwhile lives both private and public. The curriculum is based on the faculty’s belief that the best way to prepare students for living worthwhile lives is to provide them with a solid foundation in the core disciplines in the Liberal Arts (the Humanities, Arts, Basic Sciences, and Basic Social-Sciences), in conjunction with a multi-disciplinary education in the specific areas of health promotion and physical activity and mastery of writing and mathematics competencies. The core disciplines in the Liberal Arts seek knowledge for its own sake as well as for its application. Multi-disciplinary scholarship in health promotion and physical activity is essential to promoting health and physical well-being. Together these disciplines provide the core knowledge base in which all other scholarship is grounded, including applied disciplinary, multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship. The foundations curriculum thus provides a common, unified knowledge and skills base to a body of students who will major in widely different subjects and who come from diverse cultural backgrounds. Foundations courses give members of ECU’s diverse student body the shared knowledge and abilities necessary to integrate their foundational education with their specialized, professional education. Taken from the perspective of the students’ personal, private interests, this foundation and its integration with specialized learning in the students’ majors enables students to live broadly informed, responsible, worthwhile lives. From the public perspective, this integration is essential to good citizenship in an increasingly global yet culturally diverse and conflicted world. 

Background

East Carolina University's program of general education is mandated by the Board of Governors' mission statement, Strategic Directions statement, and Strategies statement for the University of North Carolina, and by the Board of Governors' mission statement for East Carolina University. The sections of The General Mission of the University of North Carolina (Long-Range Planning: The University of North Carolina Board of Governors, adopted November 13, 1992) directly addressing general education are reproduced below:

 

 1 ) UNC Statement of Mission  ...to discover, create, transmit, and apply knowledge to address the needs of individuals and society. This mission is accomplished through instruction, which communicates the knowledge and values and imparts the skills necessary for individuals to lead responsible, productive, and personally satisfying lives. (p.19) I. Instruction: Through instruction, an institution communicates existing knowledge and values and imparts skills to successive generations of students. Instruction includes all of those teaching and related scholarly activities that define the primary purpose of each of the constituent institutions of the University of North Carolina. . . The basic contributions of colleges and universities to the state and to the nation are made through students by their individual contributions through life as citizens. Through instruction in the basic arts and sciences, social sciences, fine arts, and abroad range of professional disciplines, the University prepares students to lead rewarding lives and to function effectively in the work force and as responsible members of society. Thus, teaching and learning constitute the primary service the University renders to society. (p. 20)

 

2) UNC Strategic Directions : IV. B. Improve the quality of undergraduate education.  One of the basic objectives assigned to the Board of Governors by statute is to improve the quality of education. . .  Educational quality is also determined by the breadth and coherence of the general education, or core curriculum, and by the quality of the programs that constitute academic majors. 

 

3) UNC Strategies : Strengthen undergraduate degree programs. Urge institutions to establish goals for their general education or core curricula and to review these curricula periodically to ensure their breadth, coherence, and importance to the overall undergraduate degree program.

 

4) General Statement of Educational Mission. East Carolina University: (Long-Range Planning: The University of North Carolina Board of Governors, adopted November 13,1992, p. 52): ...The fundamental educational goal of the university is to provide students with a substantive general education and to enable students and other constituents to secure specialized and multidisciplinary knowledge.

 

Fundamental Goals

The Foundations Curriculum is divided into four basic, core disciplinary areas (Humanities, Arts, Basic Sciences, Basic Social Sciences), one multi-disciplinary area in Health Promotion and Physical Activity, and two areas of competence: writing and mathematics. The fundamental objectives of the courses in each area of the Foundations curriculum are presented as both the fundamental knowledge and the basic skills a course must address in order for it to fulfill a Foundations requirement in a specific area. Disciplines represented at East Carolina University whose primary educational and research mission is to contribute to the broad base of fundamental scientific knowledge and that also may contribute to the development of new applications and technologies are identified as basic sciences or social sciences. Basic science and social science underpins all applied science, social science and technology.

 

All foundations courses in the core Liberal Arts disciplines must meet the three fundamental goals of a foundational Liberal Arts education:

 

Students must learn the subject matter of one or more of the disciplines in each of the four core areas (Humanities, Arts, Basic Sciences, basic Social Sciences).

 

Students must learn the fundamental concepts and research methods utilized in one or more of the disciplines in each core area.

 

Students must learn the relevance of scholarship in the discipline and in its core area to the student’s overall education.

 

All courses in the required multi-disciplinary area (Health Promotion and Physical Activity) and competency areas (writing and mathematics) must meet the goals specific to each of these areas stated in the appropriate section below.

 

Foundations Curriculum Goals for the Humanities

 

Core disciplines in the Humanities –Classical Studies, English, Foreign Languages and Literatures, Philosophy and Religious Studies, critically examine our diverse, fundamental beliefs about humanity. These disciplines seek knowledge for its own sake as well as for its application. In doing this, they provide the knowledge base necessary to problem-solving applications in other scholarly fields. Scholarship in these disciplines addresses the humanistic dimensions of culture, engaging and seeking answers to ultimate questions about human existence. Where appropriate to their research methodology, these disciplines focus on value, especially as regards the aesthetic, ethical and moral dimensions of public and private life. Scholarly study in the humanities promotes the understanding and intellectual abilities essential for living a worthwhile life and provides a basis for developing the knowledge and skills required for broadly informed, ethical, interdisciplinary and professional specialization.

 

Courses earning Humanities credit must address the following goals:

 

Goal 1. Students will learn the subject matter of at least one discipline in the humanities. 

 

Rationale: Disciplines in the humanities value knowledge for its own sake. Understanding scholarship in the humanities is essential to appreciating the importance of the humanities to all aspects of human existence, to scholarly reflection on the meaning and value of human existence and to achieving a full appreciation of life’s aesthetic, ethical and moral dimensions. This knowledge is an essential part of the basic foundation necessary for sound, ethical interdisciplinary scholarship and broadly informed, ethical professional specialization.

 

Goal 2. Students will learn the research methodology applied by disciplines in the humanities. Students will learn the principles and concepts required to understand and conduct undergraduate-level research in the discipline, how identify a problem in the discipline, how to collect, organize and analyze the information necessary to solve the problem and how to present the results of these activities in a research paper.

 

Rationale: Learning how to do research in a basic discipline in the humanities develops the ability to discover, evaluate, and communicate knowledge. This ability is essential to realizing a broadly informed, lifelong commitment to learning.

 

Goal 3. Students will learn about the discipline’s contribution to general knowledge. Students will learn how the discipline relates to other academic disciplines and to the non-academic world and teaching students the discipline’s impact on our culture and on other cultures.

 

Rationale: In order to develop a unified, comprehensive world-view and to understand and be able to contribute to interdisciplinary scholarship, students must understand the contribution to general knowledge of at least one discipline in the humanities, how disciplines in the humanities relate to one another, to other disciplines, and to the non-academic world and must understand specific examples of the impact of this knowledge on their own and on other cultures.

 

Foundations Curriculum Goals for the Arts

 

Core disciplines in the Arts – visual art, dance, theatre, music, and speech create, utilize and critique works of visual and performing art. They engage in the scholarly study of the history and appreciation of the Arts as well of their creation. These disciplines seek to create art for art’s sake for as well as for its social, political and other applications. Creative activity and scholarly study in the Arts promotes the artistic talents and intellectual abilities that contribute to the general well-being of humanity and that enhance the quality of each individual’s life-experience. The Arts are integral to daily life.  Personal, social, economic and cultural environments are shaped by the Arts. Scholarly study in the Arts provides a basis for developing the knowledge and skills required for both creating artistic expression and for appreciating the value of artistic expression in all its diverse forms.

 

Courses earning Arts credit must address the following goals:

 

Goal 1. Students will learn the subject matter, the practice, the history, or the appreciation of the subject matter of at least one art form. Students will learn the basic principles and practice in one or more areas of the Arts. They will gain an understanding and develop an informed appreciation of the importance of the Arts to areas of human activity and to life in general.

 

Rational: Learning either the subject matter, the practice, the history, or the appreciation of the subject matter of at least one art form develops the ability to discover, evaluate, and communicate knowledge of the Arts. This ability is essential to enhancing both the personal and the public quality of human life.

 

Goal 2. Students will learn the creative methods and skills utilized by one or more disciplines in the Arts, or they will learn the research methods used in scholarship addressing the history or appreciation of at least one of the Arts. Students will learnhow to identify and critique (i.e., “appreciate” in an informed, scholarly way) the creative persons, processes and products of at least one Arts discipline.

 

Rational: Learning how to engage in creative activity in or scholarship in the Arts develops the ability to discover, evaluate, and communicate knowledge of the Arts. This ability is essential to enhancing both the personal and the public quality of human life.

 

Goal 3. Students will learn about the Arts’ contribution to society, to culture and to life in general. Students will learnhow the Arts relate to other academic areas and to the non-academic world. 

 

Rational: In order to develop a unified, comprehensive world-view and to be able to contribute to interdisciplinary scholarship, students must appreciate the value and role of the Arts as they impact on both the academic and non-academic dimensions of life, on our culture and on other cultures.

 

Foundations Curriculum Goals for the Basic Sciences

 

Core disciplines in the Basic Sciences currently represented at East Carolina University are physics, chemistry, biology, and geology. These disciplines seek answers to fundamental questions about the structure and function of the natural world. These disciplines seek knowledge for its own sake as well as for its application. In doing this, they provide the knowledge base necessary to use in problem-solving applications in other scholarly fields. The natural world is organized on a series of levels, each of which has unique properties that supervene on the properties of the next lowest level. Scholarly study of the Basic Sciences promotes the intellectual abilities essential for an understanding of these complex systems. The study of the Basic Sciences promotes understanding of the scientific method and helps people to create and to understand the technological advances upon which society depends. Successful interdisciplinary scholarship in the sciences is grounded on knowledge of the Basic Sciences. A sound foundation in the Basic Sciences is essential to developing the knowledge and skills required for broadly informed, ethical, interdisciplinary and professional specialization.

 

Courses earning Science credit must address the following goals:

 

Goal 1. Students will learn the subject matter of at least one core discipline in the Basic Sciences.  Students will learn the properties and processes of one or more basic component of the natural world. 

 

Rationale: Scholarly study in the basic sciences promotes the intellectual abilities essential for an understanding of the complexly interrelated systems of physics, chemistry, biology, and geology. It promotes understanding of the scientific method – one of the primary ways of knowing, allowing one to distinguish reality from speculation.  It helps students understand the technological advances upon which society depends and provides a basis for developing the knowledge and skills required for broadly informed, interdisciplinary, and professional specialization.

 

Goal 2. Students will learn the research methodology, principles and concepts required to understand and conduct undergraduate-level research in a basic science.  Students will learn how to identify a problem in the science, how to formulate questions and hypotheses, how to design experiments that isolate variables, how to collect and record data, how to interpret data and make correlations, how to draw conclusions, and how to present the results of these activities in a research paper.  It involves laboratory study, which is important for understanding how science is done, how experiments are carried out, and generally how scientists manipulate the world.  

 

Rationale: This learning develops the ability to reason logically, and to observe and manipulate the physical world. 

 

Goal 3. Students will learn about the discipline’s contribution to general knowledge. Students will learn that the Basic Sciences are connected and interdependent, how the Basic Sciences relate to other academic disciplines and to the non-academic world, and the impact of basic science on our culture and on other cultures. 

 

Rationale: Basic Science never stands apart from the social and cultural context in which it is practiced.  It both conditions and is conditioned by society and culture.  It is not the only path to knowledge, but is the one that deals specifically with questions about the physical structure and function of the world. Understanding the Basic Sciences is necessary to understanding the interplay of Basic Science, politics and social policy as well as the crucial interplay among Basic Science and technology, the social order and political decisions.

 

Foundations Curriculum Goals for the Basic Social Sciences

 

Core disciplines in the Basic Social Sciences represented at East Carolina University are anthropology, communication, economics, geography, history, political science, psychology, and sociology. These core disciplines study the past and present activities of individuals, groups, and cultures. These disciplines seek knowledge for its own sake as well as for its application. In doing this, they provide the knowledge base necessary to problem-solving applications in other scholarly fields. Each discipline utilizes theoretical, analytical, and methodological techniques and perspectives in order to understand individual and group behavior. Scholarly study in the Basic Social Sciences provides a foundation for understanding real-world problems, including the underlying origins of such problems Achieving this understanding is necessary for meaningful participation in society. Scholarly study in the Basic Social Sciences promotes the understanding and intellectual abilities essential for life in general and provides a basis for developing the knowledge and skills required for broadly informed, ethical, interdisciplinary and professional specialization.

 

Courses earning Basic Social Science credit must address the following goals:

 

Goal 1. Students will learn the subject matter of at least one discipline in the Basic Social Sciences.

 

Rationale: Scholarly study in the social sciences promotes the intellectual abilities essential for an understanding of the interrelationships of individuals, group and culture. It provides for a practical understanding of why the field exists, what its driving issues are, and how scholars in the field pursue those issues.

 

Goal 2. Students will learn the research methodology, principles and concepts required to understand and conduct undergraduate-level research in a Basic Social Science. Students will learn how identify a problem in the discipline, how to formulate questions and hypotheses, understand the variety of research designs to collect data, how to interpret data and make inferences from data, how to draw conclusions, and how to present the results of these activities in a research paper. 

 

Rationale: Such learning develops the ability to observe social phenomena, think and reason in a consistent fashion, and understand how to differentiate between scientific (broadly defined) and pseudoscientific understandings of individual, group and cultural processes.  It is essential to the ability to compare methods of inquiry in one field to those in another and to recognize strengths of the methods used in the social sciences for understanding social phenomena.

 

Goal 3. Students will learn about the discipline’s contribution to general knowledge.

 

Rationale: In order to develop a unified, comprehensive world-view and to understand and be able to contribute to interdisciplinary scholarship, students must understand the contribution to general knowledge of at least one discipline in the social sciences, how disciplines in the basic social sciences relate to one another, to other disciplines, and to the non-academic world and must understand specific examples of the impact of this knowledge on their own and on other cultures.

 

Foundations Curriculum Goals for the Health Promotion and Physical Activity Disciplines

The health promotion and physical activity disciplines enable students to develop the knowledge and skills required for the physically fit and healthy functioning human body. These closely related disciplines create and critically examine scholarship addressing health and physical activity. Scholarly study in the health promotion and physical activity disciplines promotes the understanding and intellectual abilities essential to making informed decisions about how to lead a healthy, physically active and fit life. Proficiency in engaging in life-enhancing group and individual physical activity is essential to living a healthy, high-quality life. Scholarship in these areas address behaviors and develop skills that have a positive impact on overall human wellbeing.

Goal 1. Students will develop an understanding of the physical, psychological, and socio-cultural factors and human behaviors that influence human health and affect the major health problems in our society.

Rationale: The physical, psychological, and socio-cultural dimensions of health are interrelated.  To make informed decisions about how to lead healthy, productive lives, students must have an understanding of these dimensions of health, and recognize behaviors and develop skills that will have a positive impact on their well-being and the health of society.

Goal 2. Students will develop an understanding of the role of knowledge and personal responsibility in fostering a commitment to human health.

Rationale: Acquiring health knowledge and skills enables students to make informed personal health decisions and thereby positively impact the health of the individual and society.

Goal 3. Students will develop an understanding of the components of health-related physical activity and their relationship to human health.

Rationale: Knowledge of the components of health-related physical activities is essential to changing physical activity habits toward more healthful behaviors.  The Surgeon General has recognized the centrality of physical activity to maintaining human health.  As such, increasing the physical activity of our citizens is a priority National objective.

Goal 4. Students will develop or enhance physical fitness and lifelong sport skills.

Rationale: Individuals who possess physical activity or sport skills are more likely to remain physically active in later life, and thereby will continue to experience the healthful benefits of an active lifestyle.

 

Foundations Curriculum Goals for Writing and Mathematics Competencies

 

Writing Competence

 

The writing competence curriculum focuses on student aptitudes rather than on a particular content because composing is a recursive process that depends not on specific knowledge but on fluent, flexible, creative thinking.  To concentrate on the essentials of composing, the program explicitly treats stages of process such as discovery, drafting, etc. It concentrates on exposition and argument as the modes most useful for the student and the citizen.  It teaches students how to use library resources so that students may expand their access to knowledge essential for informed discourse.  The program emphasizes critical thinking as well as traditional rhetorical skills because only insight can generate substance for the writer’s craft to shape.

 

Courses earning writing credit must address the following goals:

 

Goal 1.  Students will learn to use various heuristic and planning tactics in preparing a written composition.  In drafting and revising, they will learn to choose words carefully, exploit English syntax fully, and ensure coherence.  They will learn to edit for standard written English usage, punctuation, and spelling.  They will also become competent in using the computer to perform those processes.

 

Rationale:  The ability to engage in the writing process—discovering subjects, exploring subjects; and drafting, revising, and editing manuscripts—is an aptitude fundamental to academic achievement and to a full civic life.

 

Goal 2.  Students will improve their reading skills in order to understand literally, to infer, to recognize ideological bias, and to evaluate.  They will deepen their sensitivities to connections and differences among texts.  They will increase their capacities for reflecting on experience and analyzing and solving problems creatively.

 

Rationale:  The ability to engage in reading and thinking critically is an aptitude fundamental to academic achievement and to a full civic life.

 

Goal 3.  Students will learn the aims and means of the expositor and the advocate and will learn to write in order to inform and to persuade.

 

Rationale:  The ability to write clear and expository and argumentative compositions is an aptitude fundamental to academic achievement and to a full civic life.

 

Goal 4.  Students will learn to formulate research questions, identify and search both print and electronic bibliographic indexes, locate resources in the library, and read widely for selected kinds of information.  They will learn to incorporate information gained from the library and other sources into their compositions, citing documents appropriately.

 

Rationale:  The ability to conduct bibliographic research and to use library resources effectively in written compositions is an aptitude fundamental to academic achievement and to a full civic life.

 

Mathematics Competence

 

The mathematics competence curriculum provides students with basic skills in mathematics or logic.

 

Courses earning mathematics credit must address the following goals:

 

Goal 1. Students will learn Mathematics that is appropriate to their background and educational needs.

 

Rationale: Mathematics is an important intellectual activity that trains students in logic and deductive reasoning, which are important in analyzing and solving problems in all disciplines.

 

Goal 2: Students will learn to use mathematical or logical techniques and procedures in problem-solving activities.

 

Rationale: Developing students’ problem-solving skills in the area of mathematics most appropriate to their major course of study will empower students with knowledge to succeed in their technological and quantitative studies.

 

Goal 3.  Students will develop the ability to recognize and use the words and symbols of mathematics or formal logic.

 

Rationale: This is a technological and scientific age, and mathematics is the language of technology and science.  It is very important for students to be comfortable with dealing with issues in their discipline, and in everyday life, which are most commonly expressed in mathematical terms.

 

 


Attachment  6.   

 

NEW BUSINESS

Graduation with Distinction

 

Whereas,       A student has come to me to discuss the current graduation requirements related to degrees with distinction policy; and

 

Whereas,       The student expressed her displeasure with the counting of courses transferred to ECU in the final gpa calculation; and

 

Whereas,       Two students met with the Admission and Retention Policies Committee in the Fall to request special allowances in order to graduate with distinction; and

 

Whereas,       Both students’ requests were denied by the Committee.

 

Therefore be it resolved, that the Faculty Senate charges the Admission and Retention Policies Committee to review the current policy on graduation with distinction found in the Undergraduate Catalog, Section 4. Academic Advisement, Progression, and Support.

 

Be it further resolved, that when the Committee meets to discuss this policy, the meeting date is publicized via Announce and students and faculty are invited to speak with the committee on specific situtations.

 

Be it further resolved, that concerns of the University community are heard before a final report is presented to the Faculty Senate in April 2005.