East Carolina University
 
Faculty Senate


Printer Friendly

Faculty Senate


 
Faculty Officers
Faculty Senate
Faculty Manual
University Standing Committees
Faculty Assembly
Academic Unit Codes of Operation
University Calendars
Issues of Importance for Faculty


FACULTY SENATE

 

FULL MINUTES OF 26 JANUARY 1999

 

The fifth regular meeting of the 1998-99 Faculty Senate was held on

Tuesday, 26 January 1999, in the Mendenhall Student Center Great

Room.

 

Agenda Item I.  Call to Order

Vice Chair Donald Neal called the meeting to order at 2:10 p.m.

 

Agenda Item II.  Approval of Minutes

The minutes of 8 December 1998, were approved as presented.

 

Agenda Item III.  Special Order of the Day

A.    Roll Call

Senators absent were: Professors Wolfe (Anthropology), Singhas

(Biology), Gabbard and White  (Education), Gares (Geography),

Kennedy (Industry and Technology), Dolezal, Dudek, and Metzger

(Medicine), Chancellor Eakin, Vice Chancellor Feldbush, Administrative

Council Representative Lowe (Social Work and Criminal Justice

Studies) and Chair of the Faculty Killingsworth (Business).      

 

Alternates present were: Professors Schisler for Schadler (Business),

Jones for Taylor (English), Wubneh for Friend (Industry and

Technology), Jendrasiak for Fiordalisi (Medicine), Worthington for

Lannin (Medicine),  and Tranbarger for Droes (Nursing).  

 

B.    Announcements

1.    Chancellor Eakin was out of town attending the monthly UNC

Administrative Council meeting in Chapel Hill.

 

2.    Chancellor Eakin has approved the following resolutions from

the December 8, 1998, Faculty Senate meeting:

98-33Revised University Academic Retention Standards.

98-35Clarification statements for scheduling class contact

      minutes for Fall/Spring semesters, Summer session,

      and Weekend University courses.

98-36Endorsement of the request for authorization to plan

      a new B.S. program in Environmental Technology.

98-37Curriculum matters contained in the minutes of the

      November 12, 1998, University Curriculum

      Committee.

 

3.    The next Faculty Assembly meeting is scheduled for Friday,

February 19, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. in Chapel Hill.  Faculty, with issues they

feel need to be addressed by this body, should contact one of the five

Faculty Assembly Delegate listed below.

* Lou Everett        * Henry Ferrell     * Rita Reaves        

* Allan Rosenberg   * Brenda Killingsworth

 

4.    The Committee on Committees has been charged to seek

volunteers to serve on the various academic, appellate, administrative,

Board of Trustee, and student union committees.  Volunteer packets,

with brief descriptions of the University committees have been

distributed to all faculty. Faculty are strongly encouraged to participate in

this component of shared faculty governance.

 

5.    A special thanks was extended to the following who agreed to

serve as tellers:  Michael Cotter, Academic Library Services and

Caroline Ayers, Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Programs.

 

6.    Letters concerning unit elections for the 1999-2000 Faculty

Senate representation have been mailed to unit code administrators this

week.  In accordance with the ECU Faculty Manual, Appendix A,

elections are to be held during the month of February.  Please call the

Faculty Senate office if you have any questions.

 

7.    Plans are now being made for the third annual Teaching Awards

Ceremony to honor upcoming recipients of the three teaching awards:

Alumni Teaching Excellence, Board of Governors Award for Excellence,

and Board of Governors Distinguished Professor. The ceremony will

begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Hendrix Theatre on Wednesday, 5 May 1999,

(Reading Day) with a reception, hosted by Chancellor Eakin,

immediately following. Please make plans now to attend.

 

8.    To aid Faculty Senators attending Faculty Senate meetings in

the Mendenhall Student Center, Chancellor Eakin requested that

Parking Services place 10 cones near the entrance for easier parking of

Senators attending the afternoon meetings. 

 

C.    Vice Chancellors' Reports

James Hallock, Vice Chancellor for Health Sciences, addressed several

issues: 1) Senate bill regarding flexibility legislation.  He stated that this

bill has significant implications for East Carolina University as it relates

to personnel matters, leasing, making ECU more agile and flexible in the

market place. Four task forces are being established to examine these

issues.  2) Strategic Planning Process.  He stated that on the division

level, the division was having two-planning sessions; the first of which

will bring in a futurist to assist in examining what lies ahead, followed a

planning session to address the question, how will the future affect the

professions in allied health, nursing, and medicine.  3) Health Sciences

Division Retreat. He stated that this was being planned to examine the

division's  vision in conjunction with aligning the division's mission with

its resources called mission-based management .  Accountability,

productivity, and reward systems will be examined.

 

Professor Sexauer (Art) questioned if Vice Chancellor Hallock was

referring to what we know as the traditional faculty rewards of promotion

and tenure when he discussed mission-based management.  Vice

Chancellor Hallock responded that while those are included, the division

was looking beyond that by examining research, service, administration,

and others.  In response to Professor Rosenberg's (Medicine) request to

detail the School's student applicants, Dr. Hallock stated that there were

850 North Carolina freshmen applicants last year; 1,000 out-of of-state. 

Of those, 650 who were interviewed, with an admission of 72.  

Currently, the School is approximately 6% behind this year in terms of

applicants.

 

Richard Ringeisen, Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, reporting for

Chancellor Eakin, announced a special-called workshop/forum meeting

of the Board of Trustees scheduled for the next day. The stated

objectives by the Board of Trustees were: 1) Examine the way ECU may

grow overall while maintaining quality/standards, 2) How the University

might attract students, 3) Market well to maintain some growth.  He

noted that the sole agenda topic was the projected enrollment.  He

stated that Tom Powell, Director of Admissions, would discuss new &

better ways of recruiting students and increasing enrollment.  Vice

Chancellor Ringeisen stated that he would share how the University

might better package its programs in science and technology, coastal

sciences, and coastal studies.  The Chancellor would discuss how the

enrollment growth as it relates to engineering and global park transport.   

Dr. Feldbush would discuss the new Millennium Campus, which is the

Voice of America Site.  Vice Chancellor Ringeisen also announced

Founders' Day scheduled for March 8 with a ribbon cutting ceremony for

the library.  Speakers would be discussing the development of the

library.  Faculty would meet in the Student Recreation Center and march

in academic regalia to the auditorium

 

D.    Bob Thompson, Director of Planning and Institutional Research

Bob Thompson presented the University's Long-Range Enrollment

Projections.  The report distributed to the Senators was prepared to

assist in discussion with the Board of Trustees, with the goal of sharing it

to the entire academic community. Thompson addressed specifically two

issues:  Percent change of N. C. High School Graduates (1998-2008)

(attachment H. of the report) and ECU Enrollment by County

(attachment I of the report).  He stated that Whatever the ultimate

number the University chooses to recruit, ECU will have to recruit further

& further away to reach the East Carolina University's goals.

 

Rosenberg (Medicine) asked that Bob Thompson provide more detail

about enrollment growth in numbers.   Thompson responded that the

Board of Trustees would like to see ECU in numbers ranging from

25,000 to between 25,000-30,000 students.   He stated that there was a

1,100 gap between what the State says there will be in high school

graduates wanting college admission and what the universities have

projected to enroll.  However, some universities have projected as much

as 100% increase which is not necessarily a realistic view.  When you

look at the realism of the projections, there may be as many as  8,000

students in the gap between those ready to enter college and the

numbers universities could accommodate in their established states.  He

stated that ECU could feasibly increase 3,000 students with its current

facilities and programs.  However, the largest increase of high school

students ready to enter college would begin about 2005, primarily at the

undergraduate level, although the University will grow slightly between

now and 2005.  With ECU's increase reaching to 26,000 students, ECU's

growth will become more noticeable about 2005 & the subsequent 5

years.  This will mean an additional 400 faculty and probably 400 more

staff positions for East Carolina University.

 

Simon (Political Science) stated that there had been discussion about

the Board of Trustees wanting to maintain East Carolina University as

the 3rd largest university in the State.  He expressed the faculty's

concern that the University not lose quality as it grows in quantity and

asked how faculty might be able to communicate this concern to the

Board of Trustees.  Thompson responded the Board of Trustees was

interested in the University's continuing quality as it grows.  East

Carolina University can grow its enrollment in size and quality. He stated

that the University would be stretched, but increasing the enrollment to

26,000 should not decrease the quality.

 

Ferrell (History) asked if the plan included over-enrolling as it has in the

past with the hope that the University would get the resources. 

Thompson, while responding affirmatively, elaborated by stating that the

current funding formula gives the University more money when it has

increased growth.   Ferrell (History) made the suggestion that the

University cap enrollment and that it look at some of the recruitment

strategies that have worked for the Athletic Department, such as image. 

He suggested that the University might lean more heavily on University

alumni to assist in recruiting.  Vice Chancellor Ringeisen responded that

these are issues the administration is addressing.  He stated that if the

University is to grow and maintain quality, athletics is one way and that

curriculum may be the last thing considered in deciding where to go to

school.  He stated that the Chancellor was establishing an

Administrative  Marketing Committee and that the University's merit

scholarship program was a very important aspect to consider. 

 

Wilson (Sociology) asked where would 5,000 more students live. 

Thompson reported they would most likely not be housed on campus;

there will be a proposal forwarded to the legislature in April regarding

student housing.  He stated that the University was in the process of

revising the campus master plan and would select firms to participate

including county and city planners.  He stated that currently, the

University houses 5,500 students and that ECU does not have the space

to establish the kind of housing needed for the projected enrollment.  

 

Ulffers (Music) stated that some of the things that have been found to be

most helpful in recruiting students in his unit were the programs they

offered, along with the wonderful faculty and the major in music.

 

Agenda Item IV.  Unfinished Business

There was no unfinished business to come before the Faculty Senate at

this time.

 

Agenda Item V.  Report of Committees

A.    Committee on Committees

Mark Taggart (Music), Chair of the Committee, presented the five

nominees for the two Faculty Assembly delegate positions and three

Faculty Assembly alternate positions.  Those nominees were:  Henry

Ferrell (History), Brian Harris (Foreign Languages and Literatures),

Robert Morrison (Chemistry), Rita Reaves (Industry and Technology),

and Mark Taggart (Music).

 

Following an election, the following faculty members were elected to the

following posts:

 

Faculty Assembly Delegates (with 2002 terms):

Henry Ferrell (History), Rita Reaves (Industry and Technology),

 

Faculty Assembly Alternates (with 2002 terms):

Mark Taggart (Music), Brian Harris (Foreign Languages),

 

Faculty Assembly Alternate (with 2001 term):

Bob Morrison (Chemistry).

 

B.    Libraries Committee

Allan Rosenberg (Medicine), Chair of the Committee, presented a report

on the Joyner Library Faculty Loan Policy, and the recent revision to the

policy which includes two recall dates for faculty and graduate students,

excluding the Summer.

 

He stated that, last Fall, the Department of Physics had brought an issue

to the Committee concerning the new Joyner Library Loan Policy that

now includes two recall dates for faculty and graduate students,

excluding the Summer.  Members of the Joyner Library administration

felt that the policy for faculty should be similar to those for graduate

students.   Joyce (Physics) shared the importance of retaining the old

one year loan policy for faculty.  He stated that there had been problems

with faculty conforming to the new policy and encouraged Senators to

address this issue with their respective departments and be prepared to

discuss it at the next Faculty Senate meeting, when the resolution would

be reintroduced.

 

Sargent (Chemistry) stated that the explanation for the policy change

assumed a decrease in the time a faculty member could check out a

book would increase the faculty member's promptness in returning the

book.  He stated that support should be given to the faculty members to

do their jobs, such as conduct  research.  Rosenberg (Medicine) stated

that, as was discussed in the Committee meeting, faculty tend to hoard

the books, and he suggested that the Director of the Library, Carroll

Varner, be invited to the next Senate meeting when this issue is again

addressed.

 

Agenda Item VI.  New Business

There was no new business to come before the Faculty Senate at this

time.

 

There being no further business to come before the Faculty Senate at

this time, the meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.

 

___________________

There were no resolutions passed at the 26 January 1999, Faculty Senate meeting.