EAST CAROLINA
UNIVERSITY FACULTY
SENATE
ACADEMIC,
APPELLATE, AND SENATE COMMITTEE
ANNUAL RZPORT
2003-2004 Academic
Year
COMMITFEE: Teaching Grant Committee
1.
Membership (include ex-officio members).
Regular Members Ex-Officio
Members
Sheralyn Ccx Steve
Culver
Tim Gavin Charles
Ewen
Anthony Capehart Sylvia
Brown
Margaret Bauer John
Kros
Sharon Ballard
John Bort
Robin Webb-Corbett
Carmen Russoniello
Blaise Williams
Jean-Luc Scemama
Gail Ratcliff
Harold Stone
2. Meeting Dates (include members present*).
* and members who contributed to committee action, but
were not at the meeting.
September 8, 2003 — Sheralyn Cox, Tim Gavin, Margaret Bauer, Sharon Ballard,
John Boil, Robin Webb-Corbett, Carmen Russoniello, Blaise Williams, Jean-Luc Scemama,
Gail Ratclig Charles Eweti,
John Kros
October 20, 2003 — Sheralyn Cox, Tim Gavin, Margaret Bauer, Sharon Ballard,
John Boa, Ribon Webb-Corbett, Carmen Russoniello, Blaise Williams,
Jean-Luc Scemama, Gail Ratcliff, Harold Stone, Sylvia
Brown, Steve Culver, Charles Ewen
October 27, 2003 — Tim Gavin,
Margaret Bauer, Sharon Ballard, John Bert, Robin WebbCorbett,
Carmen Russoniello, Jean-Luc Scemama,
Gail Ratcliff, Harold Stone, Sylvia Brown, Steve Culver, Charles Ewen, John Kros
November 3, 2003 — Tim Gavin,
Margaret Bauer, Sharon Ballard, John Bot, Carmen Russoniello, Jean-Luc Scemama,
Gail Ratcliff, Harold Stone, Blaise Williams, Charles
Ewen, John Kros
November 10, 2003 — Margaret
Bauer, Sharon Ballard, Carmen Russoniello, Harold
Stone, Blaise Williams, John Bort,
Charles Ewen, John Kros
3. Subcommittees
established during the year (include progress and/or
completion of work). None
4. Accomplishments
during the year, especially as addressed through committee goals. Please include
recommendations made to any University agency other than the Faculty Senate
that will be noted under #5.
The committee evaluated 16 proposals and recommended 9 for funding. The
nine recommended proposals were funded by the Interim Vice Chancellor for
Academic Affairs.
5. Reports to the Faculty Senate (include
dates and resolution numbers).
A report by Harold Stone to the Faculty Senate on February 24, 2004
recommended some changes, primarily editorial, to the instructions for
submitted a grant application. The recommendations were passed unanimously by
the Faculty Senate.
6. Business carded over to next year (list
in priority order). None
7. Evaluation of the committee (include
anything that hindered or assisted
the committee’s work during the year).
A. Charge: Clearly
Stated
B. Personnel:
Adequate
C. Attendance: Due to
workloads, it was difficult to schedule a meeting time when all committee
members could be present. Proposals were reviewed in two committee sessions.
Extensive use of e-mail made it possible to keep committee member advised about
the progress of the proposal evaluation process.
D. Responsibilities:
Clearly stated for each committee member
E. Activities:
Clearly state for each committee member
8. Suggestion(s) to the
Chair of the Faculty and/or Faculty Senate for
improving the effectiveness of the committee.
None
9. Does the Committee’s
organizational meeting next year need to be earlier than the date set this
year? No
If
yes, when do you prefer___________________________________
Signed: Chairperson______________________
Secretary_________________
The completed, typed report, including both the Chair and
Secretary’s signatures, is doe in the Faculty Senate office (140 Rawl Annex) by
May 3, 2004.