| . |
An Excerpt from Robert Siegel's Essay
From Parmenides' insistence that language instead of empiricism could lead
us to immutable truths, to Plato's form of a cat as the ideal rather than
any living cat, to Descartes' distrust of an evil genie who deceives his
senses, and to Kant's sense of isolation, the human being trapped in his
body without ever knowing what another body thinks and feels, Western
rationality has regarded the flesh as an impediment and an imposter, a
troublemaker thwarting the mind's awareness of the self and the world.
Nowhere in modern theater is this split examined and evaluated as
effectively as in the work of Tennessee Williams. What has often been
regarded as a critique of the remnants of Victorian repression in the South
(Falk 70-71) is in fact a running dialogue, a much deeper ambivalence about
whether the mind and body can communicate or even coexist. That the
battleground for this apprehension is often sexual transgression, at least
as defined by the last decade's standards, should not mislead readers into
thinking that Williams is solely a moralist.
Copyright © 2001 by Robert Siegel. All rights reserved. |